ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Management of Ocular Surface Inflammation with Persistent Epithelial Defects Using a Sutureless Human Amniotic Membrane Dehydrated Matrix: A Prospective Study Utilizing a Digital Ocular Surface Assessment Tool.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of ocular surface disease involving inflammation and persistent epithelial defects utilising various treatment modalities in the UK National Health Service (NHS).Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Amniotic Membrane in Excimer Laser Surface Ablation (ELSA): Mechanisms for Haze Prevention and Broader Ocular Surface Optimisation.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Grading Scales of Conjunctival Inflammation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Narrative Review of Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Ocular Surface Repair: Unveiling the Immunoregulatory Pathways for Timely Intervention.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report the outcomes of using a sutureless human amniotic membrane dehydrated matrix (HAMDM) in the management of a range of ocular surface conditions utilizing a digital ocular surface disease assessment tool. Methods: Two UK NHS Trusts - Queen Victoria Hospital Foundation Trust (East Grinstead and Maidstone) and Tunbridge Wells Trust (Kent) - prospectively treated patients with ocular surface disease with sutureless HAMDM. The patient cohort was assessed for resolution of epithelial defects, ocular surface inflammation, and best-corrected visual acuity pre- and posttreatment. Measurements of ocular surface inflammation and epithelial defect size were assessed using AOS digital imaging software, a validated tool for objective grading of bulbar conjunctival redness and measurement of corneal epithelial defects. Results: A total of 47 applications of sutureless HAMDM on 46 eyes of 46 patients (25 male, 21 female, age 9-94 years) were assessed across various etiologies for an average of 24.0±14.1 days. Patients with limbal stem-cell deficiency (n=17), persistent epithelial defects (n=16), neurotrophic corneal disease (n=7), filamentary keratitis (n=2), corneal erosion (n=1), corneal thinning (n=1), ocular surface inflammation (n=1), and traumatic corneal laceration (n=1) were included in the study. Across all patents, 63% of eyes showed complete healing of epithelial defects and 32.6% of eyes showed partial resolution. The average rate of healing (wound closure) was 0.36 mm Conclusion: Sutureless HAMDM application can be accomplished in just a few minutes and effectively treat a range of ocular surface disease in a clinical, nonsurgical setting. The AOS imaging software offered a quantitative methodology for measuring epithelial defect size and inflammation state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.