Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38813374›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Case report: Hypertrophic lichen planus initially misdiagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma.

Nidhi Kuchimanchi, Lydia A Luu, Preeya T Shah, Jennifer DeSimone

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nidhi Kuchimanchi *School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Lydia A LuuDepartment of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Preeya T ShahDepartment of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Jennifer DeSimoneInova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fewer than 26 case reports describe hypertrophic lichen planus (HLP) misdiagnosed as cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). It can be difficult to distinguish between HLP and cSCC, as these two conditions share many clinical and histopathological characteristics. Patients who are misdiagnosed with cSCC often undergo unnecessary medical and/or surgical interventions before receiving a diagnosis of HLP and improving on HLP-directed therapy. This case series highlights the course of three female patients, referred to a single tertiary institution between 2018 and 2022, who were initially misdiagnosed with cSCC before receiving a diagnosis of HLP. We have emphasized the clinical and histopathological distinguishing features between HLP and cSCC, the pathogenesis of HLP, and current and new HLP-directed therapy. We hope that this case series serves as a reminder to dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, and dermatopathologists to be aware of this diagnostic challenge.

Indexed as

clinicopathological correlationcutaneous squamous cell carcinomahypertrophic lichen planusJAK inhibitorsmisdiagnosisoral retinoidstopical corticosteroids

Identifiers

PMID38813374
PMCPMC11133675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.