Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38813343›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Prevalence and Risk Associated With Bladder Injuries During Caesarean Section in a Secondary Care Hospital.

Jaysingh Majhi, Brajendra N Mishra, Madan M Majhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaysingh MajhiObstetrics and Gynaecology, Tata Steel Hospital, Joda, IND.
Brajendra N MishraSurgery, Tata Steel Hospital, Noamundi, IND.
Madan M MajhiCommunity Medicine, Srirama Chandra Bhanja (SCB) Medical College, Cuttack, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Bladder injury during caesarean section (CS) is not uncommon. Various factors increase the risk of bladder injury during CS, including prolonged labor with bladder distension, pregnancy with a scarred uterus, suspected intra-abdominal adhesions, distorted local anatomy, cesarean hysterectomy, and an increasing number of previous CS. Vigilant preoperative assessment and surgical precision are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure optimal outcomes for mother and child. Objectives To find out the prevalence and risk factors associated with bladder injuries during caesarean section. Methodology Hospital-based retrospective record review of 3600 pregnant women who had undergone cesarean section during the period January 2015 to December 2023 were included in the study. Data was analyzed using SPSS software, version 22 (trial version) (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee at Tata Main Hospital Noamundi (approval number NI/CMO/26/24). Result Bladder injury prevalence was reported to be 1.1%. Bladder injuries were significantly (p<0.0001) more among the CS cases with underlined complications as compared to CS cases without any underlined complications. Repeat CSs were found to have a significantly (p<0.001) higher proportion of bladder injuries compared to primary CS.  Conclusion Bladder injuries during cesarean section are a significant concern. The risk factors identified, such as the number of previous cesarean sections and complications during pregnancy, highlight the importance of careful preoperative assessment and surgical precision to prevent such injuries.

Indexed as

bladder injurycesarean sectioncomplication of cesarean sectionpregnant womenrisk factor for bladder injury

Identifiers

PMID38813343
PMCPMC11134211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.