ArticleCureus2024
A Sudden Unilateral Visual Field Loss in a Recreational Tennis Player: Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Dissection Associated With Low-Impact Sports.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Traumatic carotid artery dissection and occlusion caused by repetitive mechanical stress to the neck while carrying a mikoshi (portable shrine): illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic cervical internal carotid artery dissection (CICAD) is a rare condition caused by blunt trauma to the neck, often through automobile- or sports-related collisions, assaults, or falls. Herein, we report an unusual case in which engaging in a low-impact sport (tennis) caused CICAD, without a direct injury. A 56-year-old man with hypertension suddenly experienced a visual field loss in his right eye while playing tennis. Carotid echocardiography revealed severe stenosis of the right internal carotid artery (ICA). Angiography revealed severe and irregular stenosis of the right ICA from the bifurcation to the petrous portion, suggesting CICAD. Upon admission, the patient had left upper visual field defects in his right eye and neck pain. Antiplatelet therapy was initiated with prasugrel (3.75 mg/day), with the intent to treat surgically if the stenosis or symptoms progressed. Follow-up angiography and magnetic resonance imaging showed gradual resolution of the stenosis, and the patient was discharged on day 28 with a modified Rankin Scale score of 1. The CICAD should be considered as a diagnosis for neurological symptoms, even in the context of low-impact sports such as tennis. Antithrombotic therapy is a reasonable first-line treatment for stable CICAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.