ArticleCureus2024
Optimizing Individual Wound Closure Practice Using Augmented Reality: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of extended reality head-mounted displays in US health care education: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Reliability of ChatGPT in automated essay scoring for dental undergraduate examinations.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Suturing requires repeated practice with guidance to prevent skill deterioration; however, guidance is often limited by expert availability. There is evidence that augmented reality (AR) may assist procedural skill acquisition among learners. This study examines the use of an AR suture guidance application to assist the independent practice of suturing. Methodology A novel suture guidance application was designed for the Microsoft HoloLens. The guidance system included a calibration system and holograms that projected over a suture pad in a stepwise manner. To assess the application, 30 medical students were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups. The control group (n = 16) was given 30 minutes of independent suture practice, while the experimental group (n = 14) utilized the suture guidance application. Both groups completed a pre- and post-test wound closure assessment. After the post-test, the control group trialed the suture guidance application. All participants completed a feedback survey on the application. Statistical analysis was completed using Stata (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) with paired Student's t-tests and Welch's t-tests with a significance of 95%. Results Both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in total time and time per stitch during the post-test. Additionally, comparing pre- and post-test assessments in the experimental group revealed a significant improvement in the total number of stitches (p = 0.007), the ratio of bisecting stitches (p = 0.02), and the symmetry of stitch bite (p = 0.03). The feedback survey supported the application for guiding suture placement and spacing. Participants identified limitations in the hologram stability and neck positioning. Conclusions This study suggests the potential to use AR to facilitate the independent practice of wound closure within simulation environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.