ArticleHeliyon2024
Dialysate cyclophilin A as a predictive marker for historical peritonitis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting treatment failure in culture-negative peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Peritoneal dialysis effluent biomarkers from a multi-omics and artificial intelligence perspective: advances and challenges.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: No markers have been used to diagnose historical peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. Cyclophilin A (CypA) is associated with glucose toxicity and inflammation. We hypothesize that dialysate CypA can be a marker for historical peritonitis (at least 3 months free from peritonitis). Method: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit was used to measure the concentration of dialysate CypA. Clinical and laboratory data were collected to correlate with historical peritonitis. Mann-Whitney Results: Out of a total of 31 patients who had undergone PD for at least 2 years, 18 had no history of PD-related peritonitis, while 13 had experienced PD-related peritonitis at least once. Overall, the patients in this population were in good health (normal white blood cell count, no anemia, normal electrolyte and serum albumin levels). There were no significant differences between patients with and without a history of peritonitis, except for blood white blood cell count (5650.6 ± 1848.4 vs. 7154.6 ± 2056.8, p = 0.032) and dialysate CypA value (24.27 ± 22.715 vs. 54.41 ± 45.63, p = 0.020). In the univariate analysis, only the dialysate CypA level showed a statistically significant association with historical peritonitis (HR = 1.030, 95 % CI = 1.010-1.062, p = 0.046). The AUC for dialysate CypA (>34.83 ng/mL) was 0.748, with a sensitivity of 0.615 and specificity of 0.833. Conclusion: PD peritonitis poses a significant threat to the long-term use of peritoneal dialysis. Based on our study, even in the absence of concurrent infection, dialysate CypA can serve as a predictive marker for historical peritonitis, demonstrating high predictive power along with fair sensitivity and good specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.