ArticleHeliyon2024
Sestamibi as an alternative to mebrofenin for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: An alternative option during supply chain disruption.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the accuracy of Tc-99 m sestamibi for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis during a supply chain disruption of mebrofenin. Material and methods: During a national shortage of Tc-99 m mebrofenin in 2019, our institution initiated sestamibi imaging for suspected cases of acute cholecystitis using a standard hepatobiliary imaging protocol. Forty-one patients underwent hepatobiliary imaging with sestamibi, 39 to assess for acute cholecystitis. The examinations were initially interpreted by one nuclear medicine physician and subsequently overread by 5 blinded nuclear medicine physicians (8-30 years' experience). SPECT/CT was obtained for 8 of these patients at the discretion of the primary interpreter. An additional 23 asymptomatic patients (6 with prior cholecystectomy) underwent abdominal scintigraphy as a negative control to determine the normal time to sestamibi accumulation in the gallbladder. A composite reference standard was used (chart review by 3 physicians). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated with and without SPECT/CT (mean ± 95%CI). Results: Of 39 symptomatic patients, 17/39 had acute cholecystitis and 22 did not. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for acute cholecystitis at planar imaging were 97.6 ± 4.6, 62.7 ± 5.2, 67.0 ± 3.6, and 97.3 ± 5.2 % (N = 39). The values changed to 95.7 ± 4.7, 77.9 ± 4.7, 72.1 ± 4.1, and 97.0 ± 3.3 % when control patients were included (N = 62). With SPECT/CT, these mildly improved to 98.8 ± 2.3 %, 69.1 ± 4.4 %, 71.3 ± 3.2 %, and 98.7 ± 2.6 % (N = 39), but not significantly different. On average, sestamibi activity was detected in the gallbladder in negative controls within 1 h. Conclusion: Tc-99 m sestamibi has excellent sensitivity and NPV for diagnosing acute cholecystitis and can serve as an alternative when mebrofenin is unavailable for evaluating cystic duct obstruction during shortages of standard agents.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.