Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38813145›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Response of chemical and biochemical soil properties to the spreading of biochar-based treated olive mill wastewater.

Giuseppe Di Rauso Simeone, Giuseppina Scala, Marcello Scarpato, Maria A Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giuseppe Di Rauso SimeoneDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Giuseppina ScalaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Marcello ScarpatoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Maria A RaoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the polluting potential olive mill wastewater (OMW) can be a useful source of nutrients and organic compounds to improve soil properties. The aim of this paper was to verify if biochar-based treatment of OMW could be an efficient method to contrast the richness in phenolic compounds and phytotoxicity of OMW making it more suitable. for soil amendment. In this study poplar biochar (BP) was more effective than conifer biochar (BC) in terms of adsorbing phenols and reducing phytotoxicity at different biochar rates (5 and 10 %). In soil amendment BP-treated OMW induced an increase of organic carbon by approximately 15 % and notably BP10 treated OMW enhanced available phosphorous by 25 % after 30 days of incubation. In soil amended with 10 % BP-treated OMW microbial biomass and enzymatic activities were significantly enhanced after 30 and 90 days, with no effect on cress seed germination. Therefore, biochar based-treatment could be cost-effective and able to facilitate the long-term management of OMW in terms of storage and disposal.

Indexed as

Microbial biomassPhytotoxicitySoil enzymesSoil organic amendmentTotal phenolsWaste reuse

Identifiers

PMID38813145
PMCPMC11133665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.