Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38813142›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Inkjet printing quality improvement research progress: A review.

Tianle Cao, Zijing Yang, Hao Zhang, Yiming Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianle CaoBeijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing, 102600, China.
Zijing YangBeijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing, 102600, China.
Hao ZhangBeijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing, 102600, China.
Yiming WangBeijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing, 102600, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inkjet printing is a prevalent printing technology that finds extensive applications in diverse fields, including mechanical manufacturing and flexible electronics. Enhancing the quality of inkjet printing has consistently piqued significant interest, with the goal of attaining superior printing resolution, precise color reproduction, and finer image details. This article begins with an overview of the current advancements in inkjet printing, elaborating on four key principles and technologies of inkjet printing. Subsequently, the article delves into the application and research progress related to enhancing inkjet printing quality across various fields. This exploration is structured around four perspectives: printing equipment, substrates, ink properties, and emerging printing technologies. Significant enhancements in inkjet printing quality, resulting in improved image details and color reproduction effects, can be attained by optimizing ink formulations, refining inkjet head design, and selecting suitable substrates and surface treatment methods. To conclude, this article addresses and summarizes future technological advancements aimed at enhancing inkjet printing quality.

Indexed as

Inkjet printing (IP)Printing quality (PQ)Research progress (RP)

Identifiers

PMID38813142
PMCPMC11133501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.