Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38813019›Full record

Observational studyTurkish journal of medical sciences2023

Novel parameters for predicting fluid responsiveness during the mini fluid challenge and ability of the cardiac power index: an observational cohort study.

Taner Abdullah, Hürü Ceren Gökduman, İşbara Alp Enişte, Ayşe Gülşah Atasever, Achmet Ali, Funda Gümüş Özcan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07037225 (Hemodynamic Changes in Left and Right Lateral Position During One Lung Ventilation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07037225 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Hemodynamic Changes in Left and Right Lateral Position During One Lung Ventilation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaria FountoulakiRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsThoracic Surgical Procedures, One-lung Ventilation (OLV), Hemodynamic ChangesArmsFluid challenge during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in the lateral decubitus position, Hemodynamic monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Taner AbdullahDepartment of Anesthesiology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2096-4646
Hürü Ceren GökdumanDepartment of Anesthesiology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-4954
İşbara Alp EnişteDepartment of Anesthesiology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2882-6376
Ayşe Gülşah AtaseverDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5743-9060
Achmet AliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul Medical Faculty, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7224-6654
Funda Gümüş ÖzcanDepartment of Anesthesiology, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3264-4356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: The percentage change in the stroke volume index (SVI) due to the mini fluid challenge (MFC) (MFC-ΔSVI%) is used commonly in daily practice. However, up to 20% of patients remain in the gray zone of this variable. Thus, it was aimed to compare the MFC-ΔSVI% and the percentage change in the cardiac power index (CPI) due to the MFC (MFC-ΔCPI%) with the baseline values of the pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) in terms of their abilities to predict fluid responsiveness. Materials and methods: The SVI, CPI, SVV, and PPV were recorded before 100 mL of isotonic saline was infused (MFC), after MFC was completed, and after an additional 400 mL of isotonic saline was infused to complete 500 mL of fluid loading (FL). Patients whose SVI increased more than 15% after the FL were defined as fluid responders. Results: Sixty-seven patients completed the study and 35 (52%) of them were responders.The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for the MFC-ΔSVI% and MFC-ΔCPI% (0.94; 95% CI: 0.86-0.99 and 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.95, respectively) were significantly higher than those for the SVV and PPV (0.63; 95% CI: 0.50-0.75 and 0.55; 95% CI: 0.42-0.67, respectively) (p < 0.001 for all of the comparisons). The gray zone analysis revealed that the MFC-ΔSVI% values of 12 patients were in the gray zone. Of the 12, the MFC-ΔCPI% values of 7 patients were outside of the gray zone. Conclusion: Fluid responsiveness can be predicted more accurately using the MFC-ΔSVI% and MFC-ΔCPI% than using the SVV and PPV. Additionally, concomitant use of the MFC-ΔSVI% and MFC-ΔCPI% is recommended, as this approach diminishes the number of patients in the gray zone.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyStroke VolumeAgedBlood PressureCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedfluid therapyIntraoperative monitoringpositive-pressure respirationstroke volume

Identifiers

PMID38813019
PMCPMC10763793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.