ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2023
Effects of vitrification solution supplemented with platelet-rich plasma in rat ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: The subject of this study was to investigate the utility of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the cryopreservation process to reduce cryodamage and increase tissue viability. Materials and methods: Twenty-one female Wistar rats were randomly allocated to three groups. In Group 1 (G1), rats were not subjected to vitrification (n = 7). Group 2 (G2) was the vitrification group in which PRP was added to the basic vitrification solution (n = 7). Group 3 (G3) was the vitrification group in which fetal bovine serum was added to the basic vitrification solution (n = 7). Warmed tissues were evaluated with histochemical (HC) and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, the TUNEL method, immunofluorescence (IF) staining, and biochemical analyses. Results: The percentages of IHC staining, TUNEL method positivity, and IF staining were significantly higher in G2 compared to both G1 and G3 (P < 0.05). G2 ovaries exhibited a significant increase in both malondialdehyde and catalase values in comparison to G1 (P < 0.05). In HC staining, degenerations in primary and secondary follicles and in ovarian tissue were more common in the PRP-supplemented group. The calcium used in PRP activation was suspected to have increased the degeneration and prevented the possible positive effects of PRP. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, PRP-supplemented vitrification solution was used for the first time in the literature in this study in whole rat ovarian tissue vitrification. If PRP is to be used as a component in vitrification solution for rat ovarian tissue, the use of lower amounts of calcium or different methods in PRP activation, or the use of nonactivated PRP, should be considered from the beginning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.