Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38813001›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2023

Comparison of the efficiencies of intrathecal and intraganglionic injections in mouse dorsal root ganglion.

Mehmet Şerif Aydin, Esra Nur Yiğit

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehmet Şerif AydinRegenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center (REMER), Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technologies (SABITA), İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-1465
Esra Nur YiğitRegenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center (REMER), Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technologies (SABITA), İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9037-5217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are structures containing primary sensory neurons. Intraganglionic (IG) and intrathecal (IT) applications are the most common methods used for viral vector transfer to DRG. We aim to compare the efficiencies and pathological effects of IT and IG viral vector delivery methods to DRG, through in vivo imaging. Materials and methods: Mice were divided into four groups of six each: IT, IG, IT-vehicle, and IG-vehicle. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) injection was performed for EGFP expression in IT/IG groups. DRGs were made visible through vertebral window surgery and visualized with multiphoton microscopy. After imaging, spinal cords and DRGs were removed and cleared, then imaged with light sheet microscopy. Results: No neuronal death was observed after IT injection, while the death rate was 17% 24 h after IG injection. EGFP expression efficiencies were 90%-95% of neurons in both groups. EGFP expression was only observed in targeted L2 DRG after IG injection, while it was observed in DRGs located between L1-L5 levels after IT injection. Conclusion: IT injection is a more suitable method for labeling DRG neurons in neurodegenerative injury models. However, when the innervation of DRG needs to be specifically studied, IT injection reduces this specificity due to its spread. In these studies, IG injection is the most suitable method for labeling single DRG neurons.

Indexed as

Ganglia, SpinalInjections, SpinalAnimalsDependovirusGenetic VectorsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMaleMiceGreen Fluorescent ProteinsDorsal root ganglionintraganglionic injectionintrathecal injectionmultiphoton microscopy

Identifiers

PMID38813001
PMCPMC10763772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.