Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812991›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024

Therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines in oncology: what do we know and how to move forward? Insights from a systematic review.

Xinya Li, Zaiwei Song, Zhanmiao Yi, Jiguang Qin, Dan Jiang, Zhitong Wang, Huibo Li, Rongsheng Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinya LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-8194
Zaiwei SongDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7064-4459
Zhanmiao YiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8575-3770
Jiguang QinDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dan JiangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhitong WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huibo LiSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau SAR, China.
Rongsheng ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3266-3496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Compared with anti-infective drugs, immunosuppressants and other fields, the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology is somewhat limited. Objective: We aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of TDM guidelines for antineoplastic drugs and to promote the development of individualized drug therapy in oncology. Design: This study type is a systematic review. Data sources and methods: This study was performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. Databases including PubMed, Embase, the official websites of TDM-related associations and Chinese databases were comprehensively searched up to March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted data. The methodological and reporting quality was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT), respectively. Recommendations and quality evaluation results were presented by visual plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42022325661). Results: A total of eight studies were included, with publication years ranging from 2014 to 2022. From the perspective of guideline development, two guidelines were developed using evidence-based methods. Among the included guidelines, four guidelines were for cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs, three for small molecule kinase inhibitors, and one for antineoplastic biosimilars. Currently available guidelines and clinical practice provided recommendations of individualized medication in oncology based on TDM, as well as influencing factors. With regard to methodological quality based on AGREE II, the average overall quality score was 55.21%. As for the reporting quality by RIGHT evaluation, the average reporting rate was 53.57%. Conclusion: From the perspective of current guidelines, TDM in oncology is now being expanded from cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs to newer targeted treatments. Whereas, the types of antineoplastic drugs involved are still small, and there is still room for quality improvement. Furthermore, the reflected gaps warrant future studies into the exposure-response relationships and population pharmacokinetics models.

Indexed as

antineoplastic drugssystematic reviewthe Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation IItherapeutic drug monitoringthe Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare

Identifiers

PMID38812991
PMCPMC11135096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.