ArticleJournal of oral & maxillofacial research
Evaluation of Gingival Pigmentation and Related Factors on Former Smokers.
Article in Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pigmented Lesions of the Oral Mucosa: Clinical Presentation, Histology, and Recommendations for Management.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025Review
- Comparative efficacy of scalpel and diode laser techniques in gingival depigmentation: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial with RGB photographic Quantification.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Gingival pigmentation, the most common etiological factor of which is smoking, is a clinical condition that causes aesthetic complaints. Due to the dose-dependent effect of smoking, gingival pigmentation may present regression following cessation. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate gingival pigmentation in former tobacco consumers and compare with current ones. Material and Methods: A total of 110 people, 70 of whom were current smokers (Group CS) and 40 of whom were former smokers (Group FS), were included in the study. Participants filled out the data collection forms containing questions on demographic features and information related to tobacco consumption. In addition, all individuals were examined with Hedin's melanin index (HMI) to evaluate gingival pigmentation. Statistical significance was set at the P < 0.05 level. Results: The population consisted of 57.3% male, and the mean age of all participants was 39.43 (SD 12.3) years. The mean duration of tobacco consumption did not differ between groups, whereas the mean HMI score of Group FS was significantly lower (P = 0.001). The correlation analyses showed that while the HMI score of Group CS was in relation to both daily consumption amount and duration of consumption (for both, P < 0.01), the HMI score of Group FS showed a negative association with only time elapsed after cessation (P = 0.000). Conclusions: Considering the limitations of this study, the outcomes revealed a dose- and a time-dependent relation of gingival pigmentation in smokers. However, gingival pigmentation in former tobacco consumers was negatively correlated only with time elapsed after cessation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.