Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812943›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2024

The concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with vasopressors and inotropes in critically ill patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Khalid Al Sulaiman, Hadeel A Alkofide, Mashael E AlFaifi, Sarah S Aljohani, Abdullah F Al Harthi, Rahaf A Alqahtani, Ashwaq M Alanazi, Lama H Nazer, Abdulrahman I Al Shaya, Ohoud Aljuhani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Khalid Al SulaimanPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hadeel A AlkofideDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mashael E AlFaifiPharmaceutical Services Administration, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah S AljohaniPharmaceutical Care Services, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah F Al HarthiSaudi Critical Care Pharmacy Research (SCAPE) Platform, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rahaf A AlqahtaniPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ashwaq M AlanaziPharmaceutical Services Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lama H NazerDepartment of Pharmacy, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
Abdulrahman I Al ShayaPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ohoud AljuhaniDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Septic shock is associated with systemic inflammatory response, hemodynamic instability, impaired sympathetic control, and the development of multiorgan dysfunction that requires vasopressor or inotropic support. The regulation of immune function in sepsis is complex and varies over time. However, activating Beta-2 receptors and blocking Beta-1 receptors reduces the proinflammatory response by influencing cytokine production. Evidence that supports the concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with inotropes and vasopressors in patients with septic shock is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the use of ultra short beta-blockers and its impact on the ICU related outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, heart rate control, shock resolution, and vasopressors/inotropes requirements. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including critically ill patients with septic shock who received inotropes and vasopressors. Patients who received either epinephrine or norepinephrine without beta-blockers "control group" were compared to patients who received ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine "Intervention group". MEDLINE and Embase databases were utilized to systematically search for studies investigating the use of ultra short beta-blockers in critically ill patients on either epinephrine or norepinephrine from inception to October 10, 2023. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. While, length of stay, heart rate control, and inotropes/ vasopressors requirements were considered secondary outcomes. Results: Among 47 potentially relevant studies, nine were included in the analysis. The 28-day mortality risk was lower in patients with septic shock who used ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine compared with the control group (RR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.53, 0.89), Conclusion: The use of ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine in critically ill patients with septic shock was associated with better heart rate control and survival benefits without increment in the inotropes and vasopressors requirement.

Indexed as

Beta-blockersConcomitant useHeart RateInotropesInotropes RequirementLength of StayMeta-AnalysesMortalitySeptic ShockUltra shortVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID38812943
PMCPMC11135033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.