ArticleEuropean urology open science2024
Urinary and Sexual Impact of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Reporting of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in the First Year after Radical Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Multicentre Cohort in the United Kingdom.
Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prostatic and pelvic imaging parameters to predict post radical prostatectomy erectile function recovery: a systematic review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Pooled it
- Initial results with an absorbable urologic scaffold to mitigate early urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy: the ARID study.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Trifecta Outcomes After Use of 3-Dimensional Digital Models for Planning of Robotic Prostatectomy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Prostate cancer screening: weighing the benefits and harms.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Article
- Disparities in Access to Severe Incontinence Surgical Treatment with Artificial Urinary Sphincter after Radical Prostatectomy in France: A Nationwide Nested Case-control Study.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Predictors of successful erectile function using intracavernosal injection in post-prostatectomy men with erectile dysfunction.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
- Network analysis of core symptom changes in Chinese patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a longitudinal study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Comment on "Comparing outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy by specialists and trainees using a modular training approach".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Fluorescence confocal microscopy for margin assessment in prostatectomy: IP8-FLUORESCE study protocol.BJU international · 2025Article
- Retzius-sparing radical prosatectomy: First 200 Australian cases.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Cuff downsizing in the treatment of non-mechanical persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence: narrative review.Central European journal of urology · 2025Review
- Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Decision Regret After Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted Radioguided Surgery for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Surgical experience overcomes the impact of prostatic-urethral anatomy on continence recovery after robotic prostatectomy: comprehensive analysis on 366 cases.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- The contemporary management of prostate cancer.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is an established treatment for localised prostate cancer that can have a significant impact on urinary and sexual function, with recovery over time. Our aim was to describe functional recovery in the first year after RP, reporting descriptive outcomes alongside validated patient-reported outcome measure scores (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite, EPIC-26). Methods: Men undergoing RP between September 2015 and November 2019 completed EPIC-26 at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo. Key findings and limitations: Overall, 2030 men consented to participation, underwent RP, and completed EPIC-26. At baseline, 97% were pad-free (1928/1996; 95% confidence interval [CI] 96-97%) and 77% were leak-free and pad-free (1529/1996; 95% CI 75-78), with a median EPIC-26 incontinence domain score of 100 (interquartile range [IQR] 86-100). At 12 mo, 65% were pad-free (904/1388; 95% CI 63-68%) and 42% were leak-free and pad-free (583/1388; 95% CI 39-45%), with a median EPIC-26 score of 76 (IQR 61-100). While one in three men reported wearing a pad at 12 mo, fewer than one in ten men needed more than 1 pad/d. At baseline, 1.9% reported a "moderate or big problem" with urine leakage, which increased to 9.7% at 12 mo. At baseline, the median sexual domain score among 1880 men was 74 (IQR 43-92) and 52% had erections sufficient for intercourse without medication (975/1880; 95% CI 50-54%). Among these 975 men, 630 responded at 12 mo, of whom 17% reported sufficient erections for intercourse (105/630; 95% CI 14-20%), without medication in 6% (37/630; 95% CI 4-8%) and needing medication in 11% (68/630; 95% CI 9-13%); the median EPIC-26 domain score was 26 (IQR 13-57). Conclusions and clinical implications: Reporting of functional outcomes after RP in terms of easily understood concepts such as pad-free and leak-free status, and erections with and with medication, alongside the classical report using EPIC-26 domain scores, increases the understanding of RP recovery patterns over the first year. Patient summary: At 12 months after surgery for prostate cancer, one in ten men reported a moderate or big problem with urine leakage and one in five men reported sufficient erections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.