Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812917›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Deep learning-based automated high-accuracy location and identification of fresh vertebral compression fractures from spinal radiographs: a multicenter cohort study.

Hao Zhang, Ruixiang Xu, Xiang Guo, Dan Zhou, Tongshuai Xu, Xin Zhong, Meng Kong, Zhimin Zhang, Yan Wang, Xuexiao Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hao Zhang *Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Ruixiang Xu *Department of Pain, YanTai YuHuangDing Hospital, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Xiang GuoDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Dan ZhouDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Tongshuai XuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong, China.
Xin ZhongDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Meng KongDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Zhimin ZhangDepartment of Stomatology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xuexiao MaDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital radiography (DR) is a common and widely available examination. However, spinal DR cannot detect bone marrow edema, therefore, determining vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), especially fresh VCFs, remains challenging for clinicians. Methods: We trained, validated, and externally tested the deep residual network (DRN) model that automated the detection and identification of fresh VCFs from spinal DR images. A total of 1,747 participants from five institutions were enrolled in this study and divided into the training cohort, validation cohort and external test cohorts (YHDH and BMUH cohorts). We evaluated the performance of DRN model based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), feature attention maps, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. We compared it with five other deep learning models and validated and tested the model internally and externally and explored whether it remains highly accurate for an external test cohort. In addition, the influence of old VCFs on the performance of the DRN model was assessed. Results: The AUC was 0.99, 0.89, and 0.88 in the validation, YHDH, and BMUH cohorts, respectively, for the DRN model for detecting and discriminating fresh VCFs. The accuracies were 81.45% and 72.90%, sensitivities were 84.75% and 91.43%, and specificities were 80.25% and 63.89% in the YHDH and BMUH cohorts, respectively. The DRN model generated correct activation on the fresh VCFs and accurate peak responses on the area of the target vertebral body parts and demonstrated better feature representation learning and classification performance. The AUC was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.95) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.93) in the non-old VCFs and old VCFs groups, respectively, in the YHDH cohort ( Conclusion: In present study, we developed the DRN model for automated diagnosis and identification of fresh VCFs from spinal DR images. The DRN model can provide interpretable attention maps to support the excellent prediction results, which is the key that most clinicians care about when using the model to assist decision-making.

Indexed as

compressiondeep learningfracturesradiographyspine

Identifiers

PMID38812917
PMCPMC11135169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.