ArticleHuman reproduction open2024
Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement
Article in Human reproduction open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transvaginal Ultrasound for Endometriosis: Learning From a Decade of Diagnostic Challenges Through a Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Observational
- Obstetric outcomes after IVF/ICSI treatment in women with endometriosis and/or adenomyosis diagnosed by ultrasonography: a prospective cohort study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Observational
- Integrating IVF and Surgical Management in Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: A Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Tailored compartment-based comparison of transvaginal ultrasound and MRI for suspected deep pelvic endometriosis: a prospective concordance study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Shortening the Endometriosis Diagnostic Pathway: A Narrative Review and Research Agenda.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Preoperative imaging for endometriosis awareness: an online survey study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Development of an AI-based magnetic resonance imaging reading support program (AMP) for deep endometriosis diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbiota insights in endometriosis.Microbiome · 2025Review
- Diagnosing diagnostic error of endometriosis: a secondary analysis of patient experiences from a mixed-methods survey.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Fertility preservation in women with endometriosis.Human reproduction open · 2025Review
- Concordance between Preoperative #ENZIANi Score and Postoperative #ENZIANs Score Classification-Why Do We Choose #ENZIAN and How Does It Impact the Future Classification Trend?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Is Complete Excision Always Enough? A Quality of Sexual Life Assessment in Patients with Deep Endometriosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.