Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812884›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2024

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement

G Condous, B Gerges, I Thomassin-Naggara, C Becker, C Tomassetti, H Krentel, B J van Herendael, M Malzoni, M S Abrao, E Saridogan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

G CondousAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3858-3080
B GergesAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-7050
I Thomassin-NaggaraAPHP Hopital Tenon, Department of Radiology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-0133
C BeckerNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9870-9581
C TomassettiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
H KrentelDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany.
B J van HerendaelDepartment of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium.
M MalzoniEndoscopica Malzoni, Centre for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Avellino, Italy.
M S AbraoDisciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
E SaridoganDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
J KecksteinStiftung Endometrioseforschung (SEF), Westerstede, Germany.
G HudelistDepartment of Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St John of God Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Intersociety Consensus Group §

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Indexed as

collaborationdeep endometriosisMRInon-invasive diagnosistransvaginal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38812884
PMCPMC11134890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.