Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812845›Full record

ArticleDigital health

SVM-RLF-DNN: A DNN with reliefF and SVM for automatic identification of COVID from chest X-ray and CT images.

Sanjib Saha, Debashis Nandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanjib SahaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8413-3673
Debashis NandiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To develop an advanced determination technology for detecting COVID-19 patterns from chest X-ray and CT-scan films with distinct applications of deep learning and machine learning methods. Methods and Materials: The newly enhanced proposed hybrid classification network (SVM-RLF-DNN) comprises of three phases: feature extraction, selection and classification. The in-depth features are extracted from a series of 3×3 convolution, 2×2 max polling operations followed by a flattened and fully connected layer of the deep neural network (DNN). ReLU activation function and Adam optimizer are used in the model. The ReliefF is an improved feature selection algorithm of Relief that uses Manhattan distance instead of Euclidean distance. Based on the significance of the feature, the ReliefF assigns weight to each extracted feature received from a fully connected layer. The weight to each feature is the average of k closest hits and misses in each class for a neighbouring instance pair in multiclass problems. The ReliefF eliminates lower-weight features by setting the node value to zero. The higher weights of the features are kept to obtain the feature selection. At the last layer of the neural network, the multiclass Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used to classify the patterns of COVID-19, viral pneumonia and healthy cases. The three classes with three binary SVM classifiers use linear kernel function for each binary SVM following a one-versus-all approach. The hinge loss function and L2-norm regularization are selected for more stable results. The proposed method is assessed on publicly available chest X-ray and CT-scan image databases from Kaggle and GitHub. The performance of the proposed classification model has comparable training, validation, and test accuracy, as well as sensitivity, specificity, and confusion matrix for quantitative evaluation on five-fold cross-validation. Results: Our proposed network has achieved test accuracy of 98.48% and 95.34% on 2-class X-rays and CT. More importantly, the proposed model's test accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are 87.9%, 86.32%, and 90.25% for 3-class classification (COVID-19, Pneumonia, Normal) on chest X-rays. The proposed model provides the test accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 95.34%, 94.12%, and 96.15% for 2-class classification (COVID-19, Non-COVID) on chest CT. Conclusion: Our proposed classification network experimental results indicate competitiveness with existing neural networks. The proposed neural network assists clinicians in determining and surveilling the disease.

Indexed as

chest CTchest x-rayCOVID-19Deep neural networkreliefFSVM

Identifiers

PMID38812845
PMCPMC11135098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.