Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812827›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2023

The psychosocial implication of childhood constipation on the children and family: A scoping review protocol.

Yvonne McCague, Suja Somanadhan, Diarmuid Stokes, Eileen Furlong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yvonne McCagueSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0449-6827
Suja SomanadhanSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0590-0126
Diarmuid StokesSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4319-8048
Eileen FurlongSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1985-2620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Constipation is a common problem in childhood that can have psychological, emotional, social, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) consequences on children and their families. Primary or functional constipation (FC) has no known underlying pathology but is associated with lifestyle, psychological, and behavioural factors. Misdiagnosis and inadequate management of constipation can result in chronicity that can continue to adulthood, reducing quality of life for the child and their parents/family. It also causes emotional, psychological and emotional distress and concern for children and their families. This scoping review aims to answer the research question, "What has been reported about the psychosocial implication of childhood constipation among children and their families?" Methods: The methodology for this scoping review will draw on the six stages of Arksey and O'Malley Framework and the updated and refined version by Peters Conclusion: This scoping review aims to present a comprehensive synthesis of the characteristics and extent of available literature to develop an understanding of and identify gaps in current knowledge regarding the psychosocial implication of childhood constipation on children and their families.

Indexed as

Childrenconstipationfamilyimplicationpsychosocialscoping review

Identifiers

PMID38812827
PMCPMC11134151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.