ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2024
Community tuberculosis screening, testing and care, Uganda.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and Implementation of a Clinical Risk Score for Early Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Uganda: A Pragmatic, Clustered Randomization Clinical Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Trial
- Modelling the impact of increasing tuberculosis treatment coverage and addressing determinants of risk in men.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term risk of tuberculosis among individuals with Xpert Ultra trace screening results in Uganda: a longitudinal follow-up study.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Pursuing policymakers, payors and public - expanding the beginning and end of the tuberculosis care cascade to reflect whole-of-society ambitions.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Resources to implement general population mobile chest x-ray screening for tuberculosis in Uganda: A trial-based costing analysis.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Combination interventions to control the tuberculosis epidemic in the Karamoja subregion of Uganda: A modelling analysis.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal trends, distribution and prediction of tuberculosis incidence in Uganda (2020-2025).BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Global status of policies and practices for systematic TB screening in high-burden countries.IJTLD open · 2025Article
- Article
- Community tuberculosis screening, testing and care, Uganda.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024Article
- Precision geospatial targeting for cost-effective tuberculosis case finding in Eastern Uganda: a quasi-experimental study.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a community-based tuberculosis and leprosy intervention in which village health teams and health workers conduct door-to-door tuberculosis screening, targeted screenings and contact tracing. Methods: We conducted a before-and-after implementation study in Uganda to assess the effectiveness of the community tuberculosis intervention by looking at reach, outputs, adoption and effectiveness of the intervention. Campaign 1 was conducted in March 2022 and campaign 2 in September 2022. We calculated percentages of targets achieved and compared case notification rates during the intervention with corresponding quarters in the previous year. We also assessed the leprosy screening. Findings: Over 5 days, campaign 1 screened 1 289 213 people (2.9% of the general population), of whom 179 144 (13.9%) fulfilled the presumptive tuberculosis criteria, and 4043 (2.3%) were diagnosed with bacteriologically-confirmed tuberculosis; 3710 (91.8%) individuals were linked to care. In campaign 2, 5 134 056 people (11.6% of the general population) were screened, detecting 428 444 (8.3%) presumptive tuberculosis patients and 8121 (1.9%) bacteriologically-confirmed tuberculosis patients; 5942 individuals (87.1%) were linked to care. The case notification rate increased from 48.1 to 59.5 per 100 000 population in campaign 1, with a case notification rate ratio of 1.24 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.22-1.26). In campaign 2, the case notification rate increased from 45.0 to 71.6 per 100 000 population, with a case notification rate ratio of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.56-1.62). Of the 176 patients identified with leprosy, 137 (77.8%) initiated treatment. Conclusion: This community tuberculosis screening initiative is effective. However, continuous monitoring and adaptations are needed to overcome context-specific implementation challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.