Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Feature engineering of environmental covariates improves plant genomic-enabled prediction.

Osval A Montesinos-López, Leonardo Crespo-Herrera, Carolina Saint Pierre, Bernabe Cano-Paez, Gloria Isabel Huerta-Prado, Brandon Alejandro Mosqueda-González, Sofia Ramos-Pulido, Guillermo Gerard, Khalid Alnowibet, Roberto Fritsche-Neto and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bayesian neural networks for genomic prediction: uncertainty quantification and SNP interpretation with SHAP and GWAS.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Integration of crop modeling and sensing into molecular breeding for nutritional quality and stress tolerance.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Mexico.
Leonardo Crespo-HerreraInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.
Carolina Saint PierreInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.
Bernabe Cano-PaezFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacioanl Autónoma de México (UNAM), México City, Mexico.
Gloria Isabel Huerta-PradoIndependent consultant, Zinacatepec, Puebla, Mexico.
Brandon Alejandro Mosqueda-GonzálezCentro de Investigación en Computación (CIC), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), México City, Mexico.
Sofia Ramos-PulidoCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Guillermo GerardInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.
Khalid AlnowibetDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, King Saud University, Riyah, Saudi Arabia.
Roberto Fritsche-NetoLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Because Genomic selection (GS) is a predictive methodology, it needs to guarantee high-prediction accuracies for practical implementations. However, since many factors affect the prediction performance of this methodology, its practical implementation still needs to be improved in many breeding programs. For this reason, many strategies have been explored to improve the prediction performance of this methodology. Methods: When environmental covariates are incorporated as inputs in the genomic prediction models, this information only sometimes helps increase prediction performance. For this reason, this investigation explores the use of feature engineering on the environmental covariates to enhance the prediction performance of genomic prediction models. Results and discussion: We found that across data sets, feature engineering helps reduce prediction error regarding only the inclusion of the environmental covariates without feature engineering by 761.625% across predictors. These results are very promising regarding the potential of feature engineering to enhance prediction accuracy. However, since a significant gain in prediction accuracy was observed in only some data sets, further research is required to guarantee a robust feature engineering strategy to incorporate the environmental covariates.

Indexed as

environmental covariatesfeature engineeringfeature selectiongenomic selectionplant breeding

Identifiers

PMID38812738
PMCPMC11135473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.