Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812587›Full record

ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2023

Evaluating Pharmacists' Time Collecting Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Data.

Cassie Perdew, Elaine Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cassie PerdewBoise Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Idaho.
Elaine NguyenBoise Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Idaho.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients on intensive insulin regimens are encouraged to self-monitor blood glucose (SMBG) to optimize their therapy. Clinical pharmacist practitioners (CPPs) use SMBG data to adjust diabetes medications; however, collecting SMBG data from patients is seen anecdotally as time intensive. Methods: CPPs involved in diabetes management on primary care teams at the Boise Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Idaho were asked to estimate and record the following: SMBG data collection method, time spent collecting data, extra time spent documenting or formatting SMBG readings, total patient visit time, and visit type. For total patient visit time, pharmacists were asked to estimate only time spent discussing diabetes care and collecting SMBG data. Data were collected for 1 week using a standardized spreadsheet distributed to 24 CPPs. Results: Eight pharmacists provided data from 120 patient encounters. For all encounters, the mean time spent collecting SMBG data was 3.3 minutes, and completing additional documentation/formatting was 1.3 minutes for a total of 4.6 minutes. Patient visits lasted a mean 20.1 minutes; 16% was spent on data collection and 6% on documentation and formatting. Conclusions: At the Boise Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CPPs spend relatively little time per patient collecting SMBG data for clinical use. However, this time can be substantial when multiplied over several patient encounters. Opportunities exist to increase efficiency in SMBG data collection and documentation.

Identifiers

PMID38812587
PMCPMC11132189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.