ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024
Comparison of serum SDMA and creatinine as a biomarker for the detection of meloxicam-induced kidney injury in cats.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Massive Unilateral Pyonephrosis with Extreme Leukocytosis in a Cat: A Case Report.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- A Review of Experimental Models of Feline Kidney Disease.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025Review
- Dried Whole Black Soldier Fly Larvae Consumption Supports Gestation, Lactation, and Growth in Cats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and creatinine are commonly used biomarkers of renal function in cats. We hypothesize that the serum analytes creatinine and SDMA are equally effective at detecting impaired renal function caused by meloxicam-induced renal injury in cats. Our primary objective was to compare serum concentrations of SDMA and creatinine in cats before, during, and after induction of renal injury from repeated dosages of meloxicam in the context of a small pilot study. Methods: This follow-up study results from data collected in a well-controlled study that included 12 healthy female adult purpose-bred cats. Cats in the treatment group received meloxicam 0.3 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC) every 24 h for 31 days. Cats in the control group received saline (0.1 mL SC). Renal injury was defined as the presence of tubular damage, basement membrane damage, and/or interstitial inflammation in histological sections of kidney tissue. Serum creatinine and SDMA concentration were measured every 4 days. Results: In the control group, no cats developed renal azotemia. In the treatment group, four out of six cats developed elevated serum creatinine and histopathological evidence of renal injury. Three of these cats developed an elevation in serum SDMA. The time to the development of renal azotemia using serum creatinine or SDMA was not significantly different ( Discussion: In this pilot study, there was no evidence that serum SDMA was superior to serum creatinine at detecting impaired renal function caused by meloxicam-induced renal injury in cats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.