Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812055›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2024

A multicenter, matched case-control analysis comparing burden of illness among patients with tuberous sclerosis complex related epilepsy, generalized idiopathic epilepsy, and focal epilepsy in Germany.

Lisa Lappe, Christoph Hertzberg, Susanne Knake, Markus Knuf, Felix von Podewils, Laurent M Willems, Stjepana Kovac, Johann Philipp Zöllner, Matthias Sauter, Gerhard Kurlemann and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lisa LappeGoethe-University Frankfurt, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christoph HertzbergDepartment of Neuropediatrics, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne KnakeEpilepsy Center Hessen and Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Markus KnufDepartment of Pediatrics, Klinikum Worms, Worms, Germany.
Felix von PodewilsDepartment of Neurology, Epilepsy Center, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Laurent M WillemsGoethe-University Frankfurt, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Stjepana KovacDepartment of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University Münster, Münster, Germany.
Johann Philipp ZöllnerGoethe-University Frankfurt, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Matthias SauterKlinikum Kempten, Klinikverbund Allgäu, Kempten/Allgäu, Germany.
Gerhard KurlemannSt. Bonifatius Hospital, Lingen, Germany.
Thomas MayerEpilepsy Center Kleinwachau, Radeberg, Germany.
Astrid BertscheDepartment of Neuropediatrics, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Greifswald, Germany.
Klaus MarquardDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Psychosomatics and Pain Management, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Sascha MeyerDepartment of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Franz-Lust Klinik für Kinder und Jugendliche, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Hannah SchäferDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Charlotte ThielsDivision of Nephrology, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der LMU München - Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.
Bianca ZukunftDepartment of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne Schubert-BastGoethe-University Frankfurt, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jens-Peter ReeseInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Felix RosenowGoethe-University Frankfurt, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Adam StrzelczykGoethe-University Frankfurt, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. strzelczyk@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6288-9915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepending on the underlying etiology and epilepsy type, the burden of disease for patients with seizures can vary significantly. This analysis aimed to compare direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QoL) among adults with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) related with epilepsy, idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), and focal epilepsy (FE) in Germany.

methodsQuestionnaire responses from 92 patients with TSC and epilepsy were matched by age and gender, with responses from 92 patients with IGE and 92 patients with FE collected in independent studies. Comparisons were made across the main QoL components, direct costs (patient visits, medication usage, medical equipment, diagnostic procedures, ancillary treatments, and transport costs), indirect costs (employment, reduced working hours, missed days), and care level costs.

resultsAcross all three cohorts, mean total direct costs (TSC: €7602 [median €2620]; IGE: €1919 [median €446], P < 0.001; FE: €2598 [median €892], P < 0.001) and mean total indirect costs due to lost productivity over 3 months (TSC: €7185 [median €11,925]; IGE: €3599 [median €0], P < 0.001; FE: €5082 [median €2981], P = 0.03) were highest among patients with TSC. The proportion of patients with TSC who were unemployed (60%) was significantly larger than the proportions of patients with IGE (23%, P < 0.001) or FE (34%, P = P < 0.001) who were unemployed. Index scores for the EuroQuol Scale with 5 dimensions and 3 levels were significantly lower for patients with TSC (time-trade-off [TTO]: 0.705, visual analog scale [VAS]: 0.577) than for patients with IGE (TTO: 0.897, VAS: 0.813; P < 0.001) or FE (TTO: 0.879, VAS: 0.769; P < 0.001). Revised Epilepsy Stigma Scale scores were also significantly higher for patients with TSC (3.97) than for patients with IGE (1.48, P < 0.001) or FE (2.45, P < 0.001). Overall Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 items scores was significantly lower among patients with TSC (57.7) and FE (57.6) than among patients with IGE (66.6, P = 0.004 in both comparisons). Significant differences between patients with TSC and IGE were also determined for Neurological Disorder Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (TSC: 13.1; IGE: 11.2, P = 0.009) and Liverpool Adverse Events Profile scores (TSC: 42.7; IGE: 37.5, P = 0.017) with higher score and worse results for TSC patients in both questionnaires.

conclusionsThis study is the first to compare patients with TSC, IGE, and FE in Germany and underlines the excessive QoL burden and both direct and indirect cost burdens experienced by patients with TSC.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsAnti-seizure medicationCostsDepressionDirect costsEverolimusIndirects costsQuality of lifeSeizureStigma

Identifiers

PMID38812055
PMCPMC11138101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.