ReviewCritical care (London, England)2024
Biological basis of critical illness subclasses: from the bedside to the bench and back again.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological Phenotypes in Comatose ICU Patients: A Retrospective Multidimensional Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multiomics characterization of acute child illness and mortality in Africa and South Asia.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Phenotype, subphenotype, and endotype in sepsis and ARDS: a new layer of heterogeneity?Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Serum lipidome remodeling in viral pneumonia: from pathophysiology to therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Precision Critical Care: A Scoping Review.Health data science · 2026Review
- Whole transcriptome analysis reveals T cell signaling activation in septic patients with thrombocytopenia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel long-acting C5a-blocking cyclic peptide prevents sepsis-induced organ dysfunction via effective blockade of the inflammatory cascade.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Article
- Neutrophil dysregulation differentiates pediatric septic shock biomarker-based mortality-risk strata: insights from weighted gene co-expression network and transcriptomic analyses.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Seaside to Bedside: Assembly in Research for Emerging Human Fungal Pathogen Candida auris.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Review of research progress in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Heart-lung crosstalk in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Critical illness syndromes including sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and acute kidney injury (AKI) are associated with high in-hospital mortality and long-term adverse health outcomes among survivors. Despite advancements in care, clinical and biological heterogeneity among patients continues to hamper identification of efficacious therapies. Precision medicine offers hope by identifying patient subclasses based on clinical, laboratory, biomarker and 'omic' data and potentially facilitating better alignment of interventions. Within the previous two decades, numerous studies have made strides in identifying gene-expression based endotypes and clinico-biomarker based phenotypes among critically ill patients associated with differential outcomes and responses to treatment. In this state-of-the-art review, we summarize the biological similarities and differences across the various subclassification schemes among critically ill patients. In addition, we highlight current translational gaps, the need for advanced scientific tools, human-relevant disease models, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying critical illness subclasses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.