ArticleCommunications medicine2024
Identifying multi-resolution clusters of diseases in ten million patients with multimorbidity in primary care in England.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of disease clusters in multimorbidity.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- Immunosenescence as a driver of the transition from frailty to multimorbidity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Comorbidity patterns and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study exploring interaction with BMI using latent class analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- DiNetxify-a python package for three‑dimensional disease network analysis based on electronic health record data.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Continuity of care in general practice and secondary care: retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Identifying clusters of people with Multiple Long-Term Conditions using Large Language Models: a population-based study.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Cluster and survival analysis of UK biobank data reveals associations between physical multimorbidity clusters and subsequent depression.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- UKB-MDRMF: a multi-disease risk and multimorbidity framework based on UK biobank data.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Comparing natural language processing representations of coded disease sequences for prediction in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Assigning disease clusters to people: A cohort study of the implications for understanding health outcomes in people with multiple long-term conditions.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
- Capturing the human impact of living with multiple long-term conditions in routine electronic health records - lost in translation?Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying clusters of diseases may aid understanding of shared aetiology, management of co-morbidities, and the discovery of new disease associations. Our study aims to identify disease clusters using a large set of long-term conditions and comparing methods that use the co-occurrence of diseases versus methods that use the sequence of disease development in a person over time.
methodsWe use electronic health records from over ten million people with multimorbidity registered to primary care in England. First, we extract data-driven representations of 212 diseases from patient records employing (i) co-occurrence-based methods and (ii) sequence-based natural language processing methods. Second, we apply the graph-based Markov Multiscale Community Detection (MMCD) to identify clusters based on disease similarity at multiple resolutions. We evaluate the representations and clusters using a clinically curated set of 253 known disease association pairs, and qualitatively assess the interpretability of the clusters.
resultsBoth co-occurrence and sequence-based algorithms generate interpretable disease representations, with the best performance from the skip-gram algorithm. MMCD outperforms k-means and hierarchical clustering in explaining known disease associations. We find that diseases display an almost-hierarchical structure across resolutions from closely to more loosely similar co-occurrence patterns and identify interpretable clusters corresponding to both established and novel patterns.
conclusionsOur method provides a tool for clustering diseases at different levels of resolution from co-occurrence patterns in high-dimensional electronic health records, which could be used to facilitate discovery of associations between diseases in the future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.