Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38811835›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Identifying multi-resolution clusters of diseases in ten million patients with multimorbidity in primary care in England.

Thomas Beaney, Jonathan Clarke, David Salman, Thomas Woodcock, Azeem Majeed, Paul Aylin, Mauricio Barahona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Continuity of care in general practice and secondary care: retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas BeaneyDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, UK. thomas.beaney@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9709-7264
Jonathan ClarkeDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1495-7746
David SalmanDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1481-8829
Thomas WoodcockDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Paul AylinDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4589-1743
Mauricio BarahonaDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-5675

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/N014529/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying clusters of diseases may aid understanding of shared aetiology, management of co-morbidities, and the discovery of new disease associations. Our study aims to identify disease clusters using a large set of long-term conditions and comparing methods that use the co-occurrence of diseases versus methods that use the sequence of disease development in a person over time.

methodsWe use electronic health records from over ten million people with multimorbidity registered to primary care in England. First, we extract data-driven representations of 212 diseases from patient records employing (i) co-occurrence-based methods and (ii) sequence-based natural language processing methods. Second, we apply the graph-based Markov Multiscale Community Detection (MMCD) to identify clusters based on disease similarity at multiple resolutions. We evaluate the representations and clusters using a clinically curated set of 253 known disease association pairs, and qualitatively assess the interpretability of the clusters.

resultsBoth co-occurrence and sequence-based algorithms generate interpretable disease representations, with the best performance from the skip-gram algorithm. MMCD outperforms k-means and hierarchical clustering in explaining known disease associations. We find that diseases display an almost-hierarchical structure across resolutions from closely to more loosely similar co-occurrence patterns and identify interpretable clusters corresponding to both established and novel patterns.

conclusionsOur method provides a tool for clustering diseases at different levels of resolution from co-occurrence patterns in high-dimensional electronic health records, which could be used to facilitate discovery of associations between diseases in the future.

Identifiers

PMID38811835
PMCPMC11137021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.