Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38811771›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A novel approach to craniofacial analysis using automated 3D landmarking of the skull.

Franziska Wilke, Harold Matthews, Noah Herrick, Nichole Dopkins, Peter Claes, Susan Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Franziska WilkeDepartment of Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Harold MatthewsDepartment of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Noah HerrickDepartment of Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Nichole DopkinsDepartment of Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Peter ClaesDepartment of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Susan WalshDepartment of Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA. walshsus@iu.edu.

Funding

Investigating the genetic basis of human skeletal facial morphologyR15DE031929 · NIDCR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WALSH, SUSAN · 2022 to 2022
$468k
NIDCR NIH HHS R15 DE031929NIH HHS 1R15DE031929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic dense 3D surface registration is a powerful technique for comprehensive 3D shape analysis that has found a successful application in human craniofacial morphology research, particularly within the mandibular and cranial vault regions. However, a notable gap exists when exploring the frontal aspect of the human skull, largely due to the intricate and unique nature of its cranial anatomy. To better examine this region, this study introduces a simplified single-surface craniofacial bone mask comprising of 6707 quasi-landmarks, which can aid in the classification and quantification of variation over human facial bone surfaces. Automatic craniofacial bone phenotyping was conducted on a dataset of 31 skull scans obtained through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. The MeshMonk framework facilitated the non-rigid alignment of the constructed craniofacial bone mask with each individual target mesh. To gauge the accuracy and reliability of this automated process, 20 anatomical facial landmarks were manually placed three times by three independent observers on the same set of images. Intra- and inter-observer error assessments were performed using root mean square (RMS) distances, revealing consistently low scores. Subsequently, the corresponding automatic landmarks were computed and juxtaposed with the manually placed landmarks. The average Euclidean distance between these two landmark sets was 1.5 mm, while centroid sizes exhibited noteworthy similarity. Intraclass coefficients (ICC) demonstrated a high level of concordance (> 0.988), with automatic landmarking showing significantly lower errors and variation. These results underscore the utility of this newly developed single-surface craniofacial bone mask, in conjunction with the MeshMonk framework, as a highly accurate and reliable method for automated phenotyping of the facial region of human skulls from CBCT and CT imagery. This craniofacial template bone mask expansion of the MeshMonk toolbox not only enhances our capacity to study craniofacial bone variation but also holds significant potential for shedding light on the genetic, developmental, and evolutionary underpinnings of the overall human craniofacial structure.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImaging, Three-DimensionalSkullAnatomic LandmarksFacial BonesFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38811771
PMCPMC11137148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.