Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38811639›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Reliable anti-cancer drug sensitivity prediction and prioritization.

Kerstin Lenhof, Lea Eckhart, Lisa-Marie Rolli, Andrea Volkamer, Hans-Peter Lenhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kerstin Lenhof *Center for Bioinformatics, Chair for Bioinformatics, Saarland Informatics Campus (E2.1) Saarland University, Campus, 66123, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany. klenhof@bioinf.uni-sb.de.
Lea Eckhart *Center for Bioinformatics, Chair for Bioinformatics, Saarland Informatics Campus (E2.1) Saarland University, Campus, 66123, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Lisa-Marie RolliCenter for Bioinformatics, Chair for Bioinformatics, Saarland Informatics Campus (E2.1) Saarland University, Campus, 66123, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Andrea VolkamerCenter for Bioinformatics, Chair for Data Driven Drug Design, Saarland Informatics Campus (E2.1) Saarland University, Campus, 66123, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Hans-Peter LenhofCenter for Bioinformatics, Chair for Bioinformatics, Saarland Informatics Campus (E2.1) Saarland University, Campus, 66123, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of machine learning (ML) to solve real-world problems does not only bear great potential but also high risk. One fundamental challenge in risk mitigation is to ensure the reliability of the ML predictions, i.e., the model error should be minimized, and the prediction uncertainty should be estimated. Especially for medical applications, the importance of reliable predictions can not be understated. Here, we address this challenge for anti-cancer drug sensitivity prediction and prioritization. To this end, we present a novel drug sensitivity prediction and prioritization approach guaranteeing user-specified certainty levels. The developed conformal prediction approach is applicable to classification, regression, and simultaneous regression and classification. Additionally, we propose a novel drug sensitivity measure that is based on clinically relevant drug concentrations and enables a straightforward prioritization of drugs for a given cancer sample.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMachine LearningNeoplasmsHumansReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic AgentsCancerConformal predictionDrug prioritizationDrug sensitivity predictionReliabilitySimultaneous regression and classification

Identifiers

PMID38811639
PMCPMC11137046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.