ArticleScientific reports2024
Endovascular treatment of stroke in the late time window with large vessel occlusion using the ASPECTS as an imaging screening criterion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mortality, functional outcome, and bleeding risk after early versus delayed thrombectomy.GeroScience · 2026Pooled it
- Early Transcriptional Changes in Neutrophil-Mediated Processes Following Recanalization After Ischemic Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Visual Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score versus RAPID-AI perfusion in predicting outcome after late-window thrombectomy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Value of Multimodal Computed Tomography Quantitative Analysis for Predicting Early Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Intravenous Thrombolysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To assess the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) screening tool for effectiveness in endovascular treatment of late time window stroke with large vessel occlusion. A retrospective analysis was performed of individuals administered endovascular treatment in our neurology department between 2016 and 2020 for ischemic stroke induced by acute large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and ASPECTS ≥ 6. Detailed baseline and endovascular treatment data were collected. Patients were assigned to 2 groups based on stroke onset time, including the 0-6 h (treated within 6 h of stroke onset) and 6-24 h (earlier/unknown time of onset, up to 24 h from the last time of appearing normal) groups. Both groups were compared for baseline information, revascularization rates, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day functional independence. Totally 221 individuals were enrolled. The 0-6 h and 6-24 h groups had 129 and 92 patients, respectively, whose median ages were 64 and 63 years, respectively. Both groups were similar in previous medical history, NIHSS score at onset, lesion location and surgical complications. The 6-24 h group had elevated intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (48.9 vs. 33.3%, P = 0.020) and revascularization (96.7 vs. 86.8%, P = 0.011) rates versus the 6-24 h group. Upon adjustment for age, sex, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, ASPECTS, Intracranial atherosclerosis, intraoperative tirofiban, stent detachment, successful recanalization, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, the 0-6 h group had a higher rate of individuals achieving functional independence (mRS score of 0-2; 52.7 vs. 47.8%, OR = 0.242 [0.070-0.833], P = 0.024). However, the rates of individuals with a favorable outcome (mRS scores of 0-3) were similar in both groups (66.7 vs. 69.6%; OR = 0.564 [0.140-2.266], P = 0.419) as well as 90-d mortality (OR = 0.889 [0.170-4.660], P = 0.889). The ASPECTS is effective for screening individuals for endovascular treatment of stroke in the late time window with large vessel occlusion. The ASPECTS should be considered a simple and practical patient screening strategy for stroke centers without multimodal imaging evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.