Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38811556›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Germline Cas9 promoters with improved performance for homing gene drive.

Jie Du, Weizhe Chen, Xihua Jia, Xuejiao Xu, Emily Yang, Ruizhi Zhou, Yuqi Zhang, Matt Metzloff, Philipp W Messer, Jackson Champer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modeling Control of Invasive Fire Ants by Gene Drive.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jie DuCenter for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China. dujie123@pku.edu.cn.
Weizhe ChenCenter for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6239-4613
Xihua JiaCenter for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Xuejiao XuCenter for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Emily YangDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Ruizhi ZhouCenter for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Yuqi ZhangCenter for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Matt MetzloffDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6108-5031
Philipp W MesserDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8453-9377
Jackson ChamperCenter for Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China. jchamper@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3814-3774

Funding

Dynamics of Gene Drives in Natural PopulationsF32AI138476 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CHAMPER, JACKSON · 2018 to 2020
$192k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI138476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene drive systems could be a viable strategy to prevent pathogen transmission or suppress vector populations by propagating drive alleles with super-Mendelian inheritance. CRISPR-based homing gene drives convert wild type alleles into drive alleles in heterozygotes with Cas9 and gRNA. It is thus desirable to identify Cas9 promoters that yield high drive conversion rates, minimize the formation rate of resistance alleles in both the germline and the early embryo, and limit somatic Cas9 expression. In Drosophila, the nanos promoter avoids leaky somatic expression, but at the cost of high embryo resistance from maternally deposited Cas9. To improve drive efficiency, we test eleven Drosophila melanogaster germline promoters. Some achieve higher drive conversion efficiency with minimal embryo resistance, but none completely avoid somatic expression. However, such somatic expression often does not carry detectable fitness costs for a rescue homing drive targeting a haplolethal gene, suggesting somatic drive conversion. Supporting a 4-gRNA suppression drive, one promoter leads to a low drive equilibrium frequency due to fitness costs from somatic expression, but the other outperforms nanos, resulting in successful suppression of the cage population. Overall, these Cas9 promoters hold advantages for homing drives in Drosophila species and may possess valuable homologs in other organisms.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Drive TechnologyGerm CellsPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsAllelesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Associated Protein 9FemaleMaleRNA-Binding ProteinsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Drosophila Proteinsnos protein, DrosophilaRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID38811556
PMCPMC11137117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.