Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38811555›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

A polygenic score method boosted by non-additive models.

Rikifumi Ohta, Yosuke Tanigawa, Yuta Suzuki, Manolis Kellis, Shinichi Morishita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of polygenic risk in Alzheimer's disease prediction for African Americans.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. An introduction to polygenic scores - methodological basics and recent advances.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rikifumi Ohta *Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan. ricky.ohta@edu.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8909-1687
Yosuke Tanigawa *Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. tanigawa@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9759-157X
Yuta SuzukiDepartment of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-9418
Manolis KellisComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. manoli@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7113-9630
Shinichi MorishitaDepartment of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan. moris@edu.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6201-8885

Funding

Single Cell Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Dissection of Opioid and Cocaine Responses in HIVU01DA053631 · NIDA · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI HEIMAN, MYRIAM, KELLIS, MANOLIS · 2021 to 2025
$12.6M
Mapping the vulnerable locus coeruleus pathways in aging and ADU01AG077227 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Kwanghun Chung, Li-Huei Tsai · 2022 to 2026
$9.6M
Identification of TDP-43 Modifiers Through Single-Cell Transcriptional and Epigenomic Dissection of ALS and FTLD-MNDR01NS127187 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BELZIL, VERONIQUE, DONNELLY, CHRISTOPHER JAMES · 2021 to 2025
$9.1M
Epigenomic, transcriptional and cellular dissection of Alzheimer's variantsR01AG058002 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HYMAN, BRADLEY T., JAENISCH, RUDOLF · 2017 to 2021
$7.9M
Elucidating the Molecular Mechanisms of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG062335 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KELLIS, MANOLIS, TSAI, LI-HUEI · 2018 to 2022
$6.5M
Single-cell epigenomic and trancriptional dissection of sex-specific differences in Alzheimer’s DiseaseR01AG074003 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KELLIS, MANOLIS, TSAI, LI-HUEI · 2021 to 2025
$5.4M
Single-cell transcriptional and epigenomic dissection of Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasU01NS110453 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KELLIS, MANOLIS, TSAI, LI-HUEI · 2018 to 2020
$4.0M
Cell type specific epigenetic analysis to understand complex mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease phenotypesRF1AG054012 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KELLIS, MANOLIS, TSAI, LI-HUEI · 2016 to 2016
$3.9M
Single-Cell Transcriptional and Epigenomic Dissection to Identify Therapeutic Targets for ALS and FTDR01AG067151 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BELZIL, VERONIQUE, KELLIS, MANOLIS · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Dissection of endosomal trafficking mechanisms in Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG062377 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TSAI, LI-HUEI · 2018 to 2018
$3.6M
Construction of an Integrated Immune-Vascular Brain - Chip as a Platform for the Study, Drug Screening, and Treatments of Alzheimer's DiseaseUH3NS115064 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BLANCHARD, JOEL WILLIAM, KELLIS, MANOLIS · 2021 to 2023
$3.5M
Single-cell multi-region transcriptional and epigenomic dissection of VCID.RF1NS129032 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HEIMAN, MYRIAM, KELLIS, MANOLIS · 2022 to 2022
$3.1M
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) 23tm0424219h0003Medical Research Council MC_PC_20058MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 21J21867NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008155NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058002NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062335NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067151NIA NIH HHS R01 AG074003NIA NIH HHS R01 AG081017NIA NIH HHS R56 AG067151NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG054012NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG062377NIA NIH HHS U01 AG077227NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA053631NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109978NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH119509NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS127187NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS129032NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS110453NINDS NIH HHS UG3 NS115064NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS115064U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) HG008155U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) MH109978U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) MH119509U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) NS110453U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) NS115064U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) NS127187U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) NS129032U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) AG054012U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) AG058002U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) AG062335U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) AG062377U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) AG067151U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) AG074003U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) AG077227U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) AG081017U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) DA053631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dominance heritability in complex traits has received increasing recognition. However, most polygenic score (PGS) approaches do not incorporate non-additive effects. Here, we present GenoBoost, a flexible PGS modeling framework capable of considering both additive and non-additive effects, specifically focusing on genetic dominance. Building on statistical boosting theory, we derive provably optimal GenoBoost scores and provide its efficient implementation for analyzing large-scale cohorts. We benchmark it against seven commonly used PGS methods and demonstrate its competitive predictive performance. GenoBoost is ranked the best for four traits and second-best for three traits among twelve tested disease outcomes in UK Biobank. We reveal that GenoBoost improves prediction for autoimmune diseases by incorporating non-additive effects localized in the MHC locus and, more broadly, works best in less polygenic traits. We further demonstrate that GenoBoost can infer the mode of genetic inheritance without requiring prior knowledge. For example, GenoBoost finds non-zero genetic dominance effects for 602 of 900 selected genetic variants, resulting in 2.5% improvements in predicting psoriasis cases. Lastly, we show that GenoBoost can prioritize genetic loci with genetic dominance not previously reported in the GWAS catalog. Our results highlight the increased accuracy and biological insights from incorporating non-additive effects in PGS models.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceAutoimmune DiseasesGenes, DominantGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID38811555
PMCPMC11522481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.