Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38811523›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2024

Leveraging single-cell sequencing to classify and characterize tumor subgroups in bulk RNA-sequencing data.

Arya Shetty, Su Wang, A Basit Khan, Collin W English, Shervin Hosseingholi Nouri, Stephen T Magill, David R Raleigh, Tiemo J Klisch, Arif O Harmanci, Akash J Patel and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Arya ShettyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Su WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
A Basit KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Collin W EnglishDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Shervin Hosseingholi NouriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Stephen T MagillDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
David R RaleighDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Tiemo J KlischJan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Arif O HarmanciMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA. arif.o.harmanci@uth.tmc.edu.
Akash J PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Akash.Patel@bcm.edu.
Akdes Serin HarmanciDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Akdes.SerinHarmanci@bcm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate classification of cancer subgroups is essential for precision medicine, tailoring treatments to individual patients based on their cancer subtypes. In recent years, advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have enabled the generation of large-scale transcriptomic data from cancer samples. These data have provided opportunities for developing computational methods that can improve cancer subtyping and enable better personalized treatment strategies.

methodsHere in this study, we evaluated different feature selection schemes in the context of meningioma classification. To integrate interpretable features from the bulk (n = 77 samples) and single-cell profiling (∼ 10 K cells), we developed an algorithm named CLIPPR which combines the top-performing single-cell models, RNA-inferred copy number variation (CNV) signals, and the initial bulk model to create a meta-model.

resultsWhile the scheme relying solely on bulk transcriptomic data showed good classification accuracy, it exhibited confusion between malignant and benign molecular classes in approximately ∼ 8% of meningioma samples. In contrast, models trained on features learned from meningioma single-cell data accurately resolved the sub-groups confused by bulk-transcriptomic data but showed limited overall accuracy. CLIPPR showed superior overall accuracy and resolved benign-malignant confusion as validated on n = 789 bulk meningioma samples gathered from multiple institutions. Finally, we showed the generalizability of our algorithm using our in-house single-cell (∼ 200 K cells) and bulk TCGA glioma data (n = 711 samples).

conclusionOverall, our algorithm CLIPPR synergizes the resolution of single-cell data with the depth of bulk sequencing and enables improved cancer sub-group diagnoses and insights into their biology.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorDNA Copy Number VariationsGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorMeningiomaSingle-cell RNA sequencingTumor classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.