ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2024
Dynamic chromosome association with nuclear organelles in living cells.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticancer drug development against ribosome synthesis and the nucleolus.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Article
- Seeing genomes.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of progressively sophisticated tools complemented by the integration of live cell imaging enhances our understanding of the four-dimensional (4D) nucleome, revealing elaborate molecular interactions and chromatin states. Yet, the dynamics of chromosomes in relation to nuclear organelles or to each other across cell cycle in living cells are underexplored. We have developed photoconvertible GFP H3-Dendra2 stably expressing in PC3M cells. The nuclear lamina and perinucleolar associated heterochromatin or diffuse chromosome regions were photoconverted through a single-point activation using a confocal microscope. The results demonstrated a dynamic nature for both types of chromosomes in the same cell cycle and across mitosis. While some chromosome domains were heritably associated with either nuclear lamina or nucleoli, others changed alliance to different nuclear organelles postmitotically. In addition, co-photoconverted chromosome domains often do not stay together within the same cell cycle and across mitosis, suggesting a transient nature of chromosome neighborhoods. Long-range spreading and movement of chromosomes were also observed. Interestingly, when cells were treated with a low concentration of actinomycin D that inhibits Pol I transcription through intercalating GC-rich DNA, chromosome movement was significantly blocked. Treatment with another Pol I inhibitor, metarrestin, which does not impact DNA, had little effect on the movement, suggesting that the DNA structure itself plays a role in chromosome dynamics. Furthermore, inhibition of Pol II transcription with α-amanitin also reduced the chromosome movement, demonstrating that Pol II, but not Pol I transcription, is important for chromosome dynamics in the nucleus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38811432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.