ReviewDiabetologia2024
The insulin secretory granule is a hotspot for autoantigen formation in type 1 diabetes.
Review in Diabetologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redosing with Intralymphatic GAD-Alum in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes: The DIAGNODE-B Pilot Trial.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Trial
- Neoepitopes at the crossroads of immunometabolism: metabolic remodeling of antigen presentation in type 1 diabetes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Strategic Reduction of Hybrid Insulin Peptide Formation Significantly Delays Diabetes Onset in NOD Mice.Diabetes · 2026Article
- A microenvironment-driven HLA-II-associated insulin neoantigen elicits persistent memory T cell activation in diabetes.Nature immunology · 2026Article
- Molecular Portrait of Autoantigens in Type 1 Diabetes.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Article
- Type 1 Diabetes: A Guide to Autoimmune Mechanisms for Clinicians.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Review
- Article
- Molecular puzzle of insulin: structural assembly pathways and their role in diabetes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Type I Diabetes Mellitus impairs cytotoxic immunity through CEACAM5 upregulation in colorectal cancer : Exploring the intersection of autoimmune dysfunction and cancer progression: the role of NF-κB p65 in colorectal cancer.Journal of molecular histology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In type 1 diabetes, the insulin-producing beta cells of the pancreas are destroyed through the activity of autoreactive T cells. In addition to strong and well-documented HLA class II risk haplotypes, type 1 diabetes is associated with noncoding polymorphisms within the insulin gene locus. Furthermore, autoantibody prevalence data and murine studies implicate insulin as a crucial autoantigen for the disease. Studies identify secretory granules, where proinsulin is processed into mature insulin, stored and released in response to glucose stimulation, as a source of antigenic epitopes and neoepitopes. In this review, we integrate established concepts, including the role that susceptible HLA and thymic selection of the T cell repertoire play in setting the stage for autoimmunity, with emerging insights about beta cell and insulin secretory granule biology. In particular, the acidic, peptide-rich environment of secretory granules combined with its array of enzymes generates a distinct proteome that is unique to functional beta cells. These factors converge to generate non-templated peptide sequences that are recognised by autoreactive T cells. Although unanswered questions remain, formation and presentation of these epitopes and the resulting immune responses appear to be key aspects of disease initiation. In addition, these pathways may represent important opportunities for therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38811417What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.