Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38811405›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2024

Unveiling the potential of graphene and S-doped graphene nanostructures for toxic gas sensing and solar sensitizer cell devices: insights from DFT calculations.

S A A Alsaati, Rabab Saadoon Abdoon, Eman Hamid Hussein, Hayder M Abduljalil, Rajaa K Mohammad, Mohammed A Al-Seady, Ansaf N Jasim, Noor Al-Huda Saleh, Lynet Allan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S A A AlsaatiCollege of Basic Education, University of Babylon, Babylon City, 51002, Iraq.
Rabab Saadoon AbdoonPhysics Department, College of Science, University of Babylon, Babylon City, 51002, Iraq.
Eman Hamid HusseinPhysics Department, College of Education for Pure Science, University of Babylon, Babylon City, 51002, Iraq.
Hayder M AbduljalilPhysics Department, College of Science, University of Babylon, Babylon City, 51002, Iraq.
Rajaa K MohammadDepartment of Physics, College of Science, University of Kerbala, Kerbala City, 56001, Iraq.
Mohammed A Al-SeadyDepartment of Theoretical Physics, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 84-86, Szeged City, 6720, Hungary. Al-Saadi.Mohammed.Ayad.Mejbel@stud.u-szeged.hu.
Ansaf N JasimEnvironmental Centre and Research Studies, University of Babylon, Babylon City, 51002, Iraq.
Noor Al-Huda SalehPhysics Department, College of Science, University of Babylon, Babylon City, 51002, Iraq.
Lynet AllanDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Nairobi, P.O.Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIn this work, we explore the potential of 2D materials, particularly graphene and its derivatives, for eco-friendly electricity generation and air pollution reduction. Leveraging the significant surface area of graphene nanomaterials, the susceptibility of these graphene-based nanostructures to hazardous substances and their applicability in clean solar cell (SSC) devices were systematically investigated using density functional theory (DFT), as implemented within Gaussian 5.0 code. Time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) was employed to characterize the UV-visible spectrum of unstrained nanostructures. Herein, we considered three potentially harmful gases-CO, NH3, and Br2. Adsorption calculations revealed a notable interaction between the pure graphene nanostructure and Br2 gas, while the S-doped counterpart exhibited reduced interaction. Saturated S-doped nanostructures demonstrated an enhanced affinity for NH3 and CO gases compared to their pure S-doped counterparts, attributed to the sulfur (S) atom facilitating gas molecule binding to the nanostructure's surface. Furthermore, simulations of the SSC device architecture indicated the superior performance of the pure graphene nanostructure in terms of light-harvesting efficiency, injection energy, and electron injection into the lower conduction band of CBM titanium dioxide (TiO

methodsDensity function theory was used to compute the ground and excited state properties for pure and sulfur-doped graphene nanostructures. The hybrid function B3LYP with a 6-31G* basis set was utilized to describe the exchange correlation. Gauss Sum 2.2 software is used to estimate the density of state (DOS) for all structures under investigation.

Indexed as

Density function theory (DFT)GrapheneGraphene-sulfideNanostructuresSolar sanitizer cell (SSC)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.