ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2024
Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Risk of Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Unravelling the Link between Inflammatory Biomarkers and Coronary Artery Ectasia Severity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk factors for acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Coronary artery disease imaging with total-body PET.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Emerging role of DYRK1A as a target in cardiovascular diseases (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Immuno-instructive biomaterials for coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction repair.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- The gut-heart dialogue: an epigenetic perspective on myocardial infarction.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Review
- A new insight on imaging characteristics of pericoronary adipose tissue for cardiovascular risk.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Review
- From incidental positron emission uptake toFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics-based study on the regulatory network of lipid metabolism-related genes and mechanisms in coronary heart disease.Hereditas · 2025Article
- Beyond the Lumen: Molecular Imaging to Unmask Vulnerable Coronary Plaques.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular imaging in 2024: review of current research and innovations.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Review
- Pericoronary Fat Attenuation: Diagnosis and Clinical Implications.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Unmet Needs in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Overcoming Recalcitrant Clots.Cardiology in reviewReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTotal coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity across the entire coronary arterial tree is associated with patient-level clinical outcomes.
objectivesWe aimed to investigate whether vessel-level coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity is associated with vessel-level myocardial infarction.
methodsIn this secondary analysis of an international multicenter study of patients with recent myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease, we assessed vessel-level coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity using coronary
resultsIncreased
conclusionsIn patients with recent myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity prognosticates individual coronary arteries and patients at risk for myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.