Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38810714›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2024

Sex differences in spontaneous behavior and cognition in mice using an automated behavior monitoring system.

Briana J Bernstein, Dalisa R Kendricks, Sydney Fry, Leslie Wilson, Bastijn Koopmans, Maarten Loos, Korey D Stevanovic, Jesse D Cushman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Briana J BernsteinInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Dalisa R KendricksNeurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Science (NIEHS), National Institute of Health, NC, USA.
Sydney FryUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado, CO, USA.
Leslie WilsonNeurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Science (NIEHS), National Institute of Health, NC, USA.
Bastijn KoopmansSylics (Synaptologics B.V.), Bilthoven, the Netherlands; InnoSer Nederland B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maarten LoosSylics (Synaptologics B.V.), Bilthoven, the Netherlands; InnoSer Nederland B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands.
Korey D StevanovicNeurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Science (NIEHS), National Institute of Health, NC, USA.
Jesse D CushmanNeurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Science (NIEHS), National Institute of Health, NC, USA. Electronic address: jesse.cushman@nih.gov.

Funding

Neurobehavioral Core LaboratoryZICES103330 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CUSHMAN, JESSE · 2018 to 2025
$13.3M
Predoctoral Training in Intergrative NeuroscienceT32NS041231 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Ludise Malkova, Ashley S VanMeter · 2001 to 2026
$6.8M
Developmental Neurotoxicity Health Effects Innovation Research ProgramZIAES103387 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MCPHERSON, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY · 2022 to 2025
$5.2M
Training in Neural Injury &PlasticityT32NS041218 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARK P BURNS, Kathleen Anne Maguire-Zeiss · 2001 to 2026
$3.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIC ES103330NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041218NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolation of sex differences as a key characteristic underlying neurobehavioral differentiation is an essential component of studies in neuroscience. The current study sought to address this concern by observing behavioral differences using an automated home cage system for neurobehavioral assessment, a method rapidly increasing in use due to advances in technology and advantages such as reduced handling stress and cross-lab variability. Sex differences in C57BL/6 mice arose for motor activity and circadian-linked behavior, with females being more active compared to males, and males having a stronger anticipatory increase in activity leading up to the onset of the light phase compared to females. These activity differences were observed not only across the lifespan, but also in different genetic background mouse strains across different testing sites showing the generalizability and robustness of these observed effects. Activity differences were also observed in performance on a spatial learning and reversal task with females making more responses and receiving a corresponding elevation in reward pellets. Notably, there were no sex differences in learning nor achieved accuracy, suggesting these observed effects were predominantly in activity. The outcomes of this study align with previous reports showcasing differences in activity between males and females. The comparison across strains and testing sites showed robust and reproducible differences in behavior between female and male mice that are relevant to consider when designing behavioral studies. Furthermore, the observed sex differences in performance on the learning and reversal procedure raise concern for interpretation of behavior differences between sexes due to the attribution of these differences to motor activity rather than cognition.

Indexed as

CognitionMice, Inbred C57BLMotor ActivitySex CharacteristicsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCircadian RhythmFemaleMaleMaze LearningMiceReversal LearningSpatial LearningAgingMulti-lab comparisonPhenoTyperRodent behaviorSex difference

Identifiers

PMID38810714
PMCPMC11246821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.