ArticleNeurology2024
Associations Between Self and Study Partner Report of Cognitive Decline With Regional Tau in a Multicohort Study.
Article in Neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarker-Informed Interpretation of Dyadic Cognitive Function Index Scores in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Observational
- Association of item-level responses to cognitive function index with tau pathology and hippocampal volume in the A4 Study.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesSelf-reported cognitive decline is an early behavioral manifestation of Alzheimer disease (AD) at the preclinical stage, often believed to precede concerns reported by a study partner. Previous work shows cross-sectional associations with β-amyloid (Aβ) status and self-reported and study partner-reported cognitive decline, but less is known about their associations with tau deposition, particularly among those with preclinical AD.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included participants from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic AD/Longitudinal Evaluation of Amyloid Risk and Neurodegeneration studies (N = 444) and the Harvard Aging Brain Study and affiliated studies (N = 231), which resulted in a cognitively unimpaired (CU) sample of individuals with both nonelevated (Aβ-) and elevated Aβ (Aβ+). All participants and study partners completed the Cognitive Function Index (CFI). Two regional tau composites were derived by averaging flortaucipir PET uptake in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and neocortex (NEO). Global Aβ PET was measured in Centiloids (CLs) with Aβ+ >26 CL. We conducted multiple linear regression analyses to test associations between tau PET and CFI, covarying for amyloid, age, sex, education, and cohort. We also controlled for objective cognitive performance, measured using the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC).
resultsAcross 675 CU participants (age = 72.3 ± 6.6 years, female = 59%, Aβ+ = 60%), greater tau was associated with greater self-CFI (MTL: β = 0.28 [0.12, 0.44], DISCUSSION: Both self-report and study partner report showed associations with tau in addition to Aβ. Additionally, self-report and study partner report were associated with tau above and beyond performance on a neuropsychological composite. Stratification analyses by Aβ status indicate that associations between self-reported and study partner-reported cognitive concerns with regional tau are driven by those at the preclinical stage of AD, suggesting that both are useful to collect on the early AD continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.