ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024
Extraction and Imputation of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status From Unstructured Oncology Notes Using Language Models.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A review on knowledge and information extraction from PDF documents and storage approaches.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Morning versus afternoon administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Trial
- Prognostic data extraction harnessing a privacy-preserving large language model: a clinician-AI collaborative retrospective evaluation in head and neck oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Assessment of Cancer Patient Performance Status Documentation in a Large, Multicentre Hospital System.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Performance of Predefined Search Patterns for Identifying Documented Goals-of-Care Discussions in Inpatient Electronic Health Records.Journal of palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Managing HIV-Associated Hodgkin Lymphoma During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Report and Literature Review.Viruses · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) is a key clinical variable for cancer treatment and research, but it is usually only recorded in unstructured form in the electronic health record. We investigated whether natural language processing (NLP) models can impute ECOG PS using unstructured note text. MATERIALS AND
methodsMedical oncology notes were identified from all patients with cancer at our center from 1997 to 2023 and divided at the patient level into training (approximately 80%), tuning/validation (approximately 10%), and test (approximately 10%) sets. Regular expressions were used to extract explicitly documented PS. Extracted PS labels were used to train NLP models to impute ECOG PS (0-1
resultsECOG PS was extracted using regular expressions from 495,862 notes, corresponding to 79,698 patients. A Transformer-based Longformer model imputed PS with high discrimination (test set area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.95, area under the precision-recall curve 0.73). Imputed poor PS was associated with worse OS, including among notes with no explicit documentation of PS detected (OS hazard ratio, 11.9; 95% CI, 11.1 to 12.8).
conclusionNLP models can be used to impute performance status from unstructured oncologist notes at scale. This may aid the annotation of oncology data sets for clinical outcomes research and cancer care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.