Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38810109›Full record

ReviewACS nano2024

Transfer of 2D Films: From Imperfection to Perfection.

Phuong V Pham, The-Hung Mai, Saroj P Dash, Vasudevanpillai Biju, Yu-Lun Chueh, Deep Jariwala, Vincent Tung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Flattening Energy Puddles for Enhanced Charge Transport in Wrinkled WSeSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Phuong V PhamDepartment of Physics, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7951-1329
The-Hung MaiDepartment of Physics, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0009-2452-6641
Saroj P DashDepartment of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg 41296, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7931-4843
Vasudevanpillai BijuResearch Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 001-0020, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-9637
Yu-Lun ChuehDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0155-9987
Deep JariwalaDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-8768
Vincent TungDepartment of Chemical System Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomically thin 2D films and their van der Waals heterostructures have demonstrated immense potential for breakthroughs and innovations in science and technology. Integrating 2D films into electronics and optoelectronics devices and their applications in electronics and optoelectronics can lead to improve device efficiencies and tunability. Consequently, there has been steady progress in large-area 2D films for both front- and back-end technologies, with a keen interest in optimizing different growth and synthetic techniques. Parallelly, a significant amount of attention has been directed toward efficient transfer techniques of 2D films on different substrates. Current methods for synthesizing 2D films often involve high-temperature synthesis, precursors, and growth stimulants with highly chemical reactivity. This limitation hinders the widespread applications of 2D films. As a result, reports concerning transfer strategies of 2D films from bare substrates to target substrates have proliferated, showcasing varying degrees of cleanliness, surface damage, and material uniformity. This review aims to evaluate, discuss, and provide an overview of the most advanced transfer methods to date, encompassing wet, dry, and quasi-dry transfer methods. The processes, mechanisms, and pros and cons of each transfer method are critically summarized. Furthermore, we discuss the feasibility of these 2D film transfer methods, concerning their applications in devices and various technology platforms.

Indexed as

2D films2D materialschemical vapor depositiondry transferquasi-dry transfertransfer processtransfer technologywet transfer

Identifiers

PMID38810109
PMCPMC11171780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.