ReviewDermatology practical & conceptual2024
Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Concept of Intraoperative Fluorescence Diagnostics for Photodynamic Dosimetry of Tumors Using Chlorin-Based Photosensitizers.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Photodynamic Therapy for Keratinocytic Precancerous Lesions and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Laser Therapy in Basal Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence, Literature Gaps and Future Perspectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Large Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Combination Topical Therapy.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBasal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer worldwide and has been reported to have a rising incidence in the last years. Multiple therapeutic modalities are approved for the treatment of BCC, making it difficult for physicians to choose the most suitable option for every patient. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using either 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) as photosensitizing agents is an established treatment option for low-risk BCC.
objectivesThis review aims to summarize the available evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that utilize either ALA or MAL PDT and compare it with other treatment modalities. The main outcomes related to the effectiveness, adverse events, cosmetic outcomes and pain sensation, along with data from long-term follow-ups will be presented and discussed.
methodsThorough literature searches were conducted through the electronic databases ClinicalTrials. gov and Pubmed/MEDLINE from inception up to 28 March 2023. Only studies in English were included. All relevant data were extracted accordingly from the eligible studies.
resultsEight RCTs included superficial BCC (sBCC) alone, 7 included nodular BCC (nBCC), 2 included both sBCC and nBCC and 1 included BCC of unspecified subtype. Follow-up duration ranged from 3 months to 5 years. Both ALA-PDT and MAL-PDT demonstrated acceptable efficacy, adverse events, cosmetic outcomes and pain sensation while no major differences were observed between them. PDT was less effective than surgery but with better reported cosmetic outcomes.
conclusionsPDT is a safe and efficacious treatment option for sBCC and to a lesser extent nBCC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.