Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809939›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Effects of post-saccadic oscillations on visual processing times.

Emsal Llapashtica, Tong Sun, Kenneth T V Grattan, John L Barbur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emsal LlapashticaThe Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Science, Centre for Applied Vision Research, School of Health & Psychological Sciences, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1941-9971
Tong SunDepartment of Engineering, School of Science and Technology, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Kenneth T V GrattanDepartment of Engineering, School of Science and Technology, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
John L BarburThe Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Science, Centre for Applied Vision Research, School of Health & Psychological Sciences, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-5004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements enable us to search for the target of interest in a crowded scene or, in the case of goal-directed saccades, to simply bring the image of the peripheral target to the very centre of the fovea. This mechanism extends the use of the superior image processing performance of the fovea over a large visual field. We know that visual information is processed quickly at the end of each saccade but estimates of the times involved remain controversial. This study aims to investigate the processing of visual information during post fixation oscillations of the eyeball. A new psychophysical test measures the combined eye movement response latencies, including fixation duration and visual processing times. When the test is used in conjunction with an eye tracker, each component that makes up the 'integrated saccade latency' time, from the onset of the peripheral stimulus to the correct interpretation of the information carried by the stimulus, can be measured and the discrete components delineated. The results show that the time required to process and encode the stimulus attribute of interest at the end of a saccade is longer than the time needed to carry out the same task in the absence of an eye movement. We propose two principal hypotheses, each of which can account for this finding. 1. The known inhibition of afferent retinal signals during fast eye movements extends beyond the end point of the saccade. 2. The extended visual processing times measured when saccades are involved are caused by the transient loss of spatial resolution due to eyeball instability during post-saccadic oscillations. The latter can best be described as retinal image smear with greater loss of spatial resolution expected for stimuli of low luminance contrast.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularReaction TimeSaccadesVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationTime FactorsVisual FieldsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38809939
PMCPMC11135737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.