Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809930›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Acoustic behavior of humpback whale calves on the feeding ground: Comparisons across age and implications for vocal development.

Julia M Zeh, Dana L Adcock, Valeria Perez-Marrufo, Dana A Cusano, Jooke Robbins, Jennifer E Tackaberry, Frants H Jensen, Mason Weinrich, Ari S Friedlaender, David N Wiley and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia M ZehDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5094-100X
Dana L AdcockDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Valeria Perez-MarrufoDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Dana A CusanoDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Jooke RobbinsCenter for Coastal Studies, Provincetown, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6382-722X
Jennifer E TackaberryCenter for Coastal Studies, Provincetown, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Frants H JensenDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Mason WeinrichWhale Center of New England, Gloucester, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0007-3037-8863
Ari S FriedlaenderInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
David N WileyStellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary, Scituate, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Susan E ParksDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying sound production at different developmental stages can provide insight into the processes involved in vocal ontogeny. Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) are a known vocal learning species, but their vocal development is poorly understood. While studies of humpback whale calves in the early stages of their lives on the breeding grounds and migration routes exist, little is known about the behavior of these immature, dependent animals by the time they reach the feeding grounds. In this study, we used data from groups of North Atlantic humpback whales in the Gulf of Maine in which all members were simultaneously carrying acoustic recording tags attached with suction cups. This allowed for assignment of likely caller identity using the relative received levels of calls across tags. We analyzed data from 3 calves and 13 adults. There were high levels of call rate variation among these individuals and the results represent preliminary descriptions of calf behavior. Our analysis suggests that, in contrast to the breeding grounds or on migration, calves are no longer acoustically cryptic by the time they reach their feeding ground. Calves and adults both produce calls in bouts, but there may be some differences in bout parameters like inter-call intervals and bout durations. Calves were able to produce most of the adult vocal repertoire but used different call types in different proportions. Finally, we found evidence of immature call types in calves, akin to protosyllables used in babbling in other mammals, including humans. Overall, the sound production of humpback whale calves on the feeding grounds appears to be already similar to that of adults, but with differences in line with ontogenetic changes observed in other vocal learning species.

Indexed as

Humpback WhaleVocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID38809930
PMCPMC11135678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.