Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809884›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Evaluation of rapid diagnostic test kits for detection of Treponema pallidum antibody.

Sirinart Chomean, Palakorn Puttaruk, Phakawat Khamsophar, Waraphorn Fukpo, Chollanot Kaset

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sirinart ChomeanDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Palakorn PuttarukMedical Technology Laboratory, Thammasat University Hospital, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Phakawat KhamsopharMedical Technology Laboratory, Thammasat University Hospital, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Waraphorn FukpoMedical Technology Laboratory, Thammasat University Hospital, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Chollanot KasetDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2110-6918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid syphilis testing plays a crucial role in global health strategies, addressing the urgent need for prompt and accurate diagnostics, especially in settings with limited resources. Despite their practical utility, these tests often lack thorough validation, leading to concerns about their efficacy and reliability. This study aims to evaluate two prototypes of the Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test (Fd and Ff) and compare their performance with the established chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) method. Employing a reverse algorithm approach, the study analyzed 450 serum samples, including those from syphilis patients, healthy individuals, and cases with potential cross-reactions. Results of the rapid test kit were then correlated with CMIA findings, RPR, and TPPA titers. The results showed that prototype Fd exhibited a sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 98.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 8.4%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 100.00% and accuracy of 98.8%. Similarly, prototype Ff exhibited sensitivity of 100.0%, but with a slightly higher specificity of 99.6%, PPV of 21.5%, NPV of 100.0% and accuracy of 99.6%. Moreover, both prototypes Fd and Ff of the Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test demonstrated significant efficacy diagnostic tool, offering clear and straightforward interpretation for clinicians in varied CMIA, RPR and TPPA titer scenarios. The Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test prototypes, Fd and Ff, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, comparable to CMIA methods. The effectiveness highlights their suitability for syphilis screening, particularly in non-laboratory settings or situations requiring immediate results. The validation of these prototypes supports their integration into current syphilis diagnostic algorithms, potentially contributing to improved public health outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificitySyphilisSyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponema pallidumAdultFemaleHumansImmunoassayMaleMiddle AgedRapid Diagnostic TestsReproducibility of ResultsAntibodies, BacterialReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID38809884
PMCPMC11135684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.