ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2024
Modeling Chromatography Binding through Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Resin Fragments.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate atomistic modeling of the interactions of a chromatography resin with a solute can inform the selection of purification conditions for a product, an important problem in the biotech and pharmaceutical industries. We present a molecular dynamics simulation-based approach for the qualitative prediction of interaction sites (specificity) and retention times (affinity) of a protein for a given chromatography resin. We mimicked the resin with an unrestrained ligand composed of the resin headgroup coupled with successively larger fragments of the agarose backbone. The interactions of the ligand with the protein are simulated in an explicit solvent using the Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics enhanced sampling approach in conjunction with Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning (REMD-HMR). We computed the ligand interaction surface from the simulation trajectories and correlated the features of the interaction surface with experimentally determined retention times. The simulation and analysis protocol were first applied to a series of ubiquitin mutants for which retention times on Capto MMC resin are available. The ubiquitin simulations helped identify the optimal ligand that was used in subsequent simulations on six proteins for which Capto MMC elution times are available. For each of the six proteins, we computed the interaction surface and characterized it in terms of a range of simulation-averaged residue-level physicochemical descriptors. Modeling of the salt concentrations required for elution with respect to the descriptors resulted in a linear fit in terms of aromaphilicity and Kyte-Doolittle hydrophobicity that was robust to outliers, showed high correlation, and correctly ranked the protein elution order. The physics-based model building approach described here does not require a large experimental data set and can be readily applied to different resins and diverse biomolecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.