Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809714›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2024

Threat of shock increases distractor susceptibility during the short-term maintenance of visual information.

Abigail Casalvera, Madeline Goodwin, Kevin G Lynch, Marta Teferi, Milan Patel, Christian Grillon, Monique Ernst, Nicholas L Balderston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abigail CasalveraCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Madeline GoodwinSection on the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kevin G LynchDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marta TeferiCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Milan PatelCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christian GrillonSection on the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Monique ErnstSection on the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nicholas L BalderstonCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8565-1544

Funding

The Psychophysiology Of Fear And AnxietyZIAMH002798 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI GRILLON, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2022
$29.0M
Examining the mechanisms of anxiety regulation using a novel, sham-controlled, fMRI-guided rTMS protocol and a translational laboratory model of anxiety.K01MH121777 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BALDERSTON, NICHOLAS LEE · 2019 to 2022
$723k
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation K01MH121777Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002798Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)NIH HHSNIH HHS NCT00047853 ZIAMH002798NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH121777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated arousal in anxiety is thought to affect attention control. To test this, we designed a visual short-term memory (VSTM) task to examine distractor suppression during periods of threat and no-threat. We hypothesized that threat would impair performance when subjects had to filter out large numbers of distractors. The VSTM task required subjects to attend to one array of squares while ignoring a separate array. The number of target and distractor squares varied systematically, with high (four squares) and low (two squares) target and distractor conditions. This study comprised two separate experiments. Experiment 1 used startle responses and white noise as to directly measure threat-induced anxiety. Experiment 2 used BOLD to measure brain responses. For Experiment 1, subjects showed significantly larger startle responses during threat compared to safe period, supporting the validity of the threat manipulation. For Experiment 2, we found that accuracy was affected by threat, such that the distractor load negatively impacted accuracy only in the threat condition. We also found threat-related differences in parietal cortex activity. Overall, these findings suggest that threat affects distractor susceptibility, impairing filtering of distracting information. This effect is possibly mediated by hyperarousal of parietal cortex during threat.

Indexed as

AttentionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemory, Short-TermReflex, StartleAdolescentAdultAnxietyBrainBrain MappingFearFemaleHumansMaleOxygenPhotic StimulationReaction TimeOxygenanxietyattentionorientingstartlethreatvisual short-term memory

Identifiers

PMID38809714
PMCPMC11173208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.