Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809635›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024

Inflammatory Markers in Prior Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) as a Prognosis Factor in the Recurrence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Samornrat Bunpreenant, Wanlaya Onwatanasrikul, Jenny Kim, Piyawan Pariyawateekul, Worrawan Sirichai, Pichamon Sukkasame, Kornkarn Bhamarapravatana, Komsun Suwannarurk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samornrat BunpreenantDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3084-4274
Wanlaya OnwatanasrikulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0007-1292-5632
Jenny KimChulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Piyawan PariyawateekulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worrawan SirichaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pichamon SukkasameDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kornkarn BhamarapravatanaThammasat University Patumthani Thailand, Thailand.
Komsun SuwannarurkGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Thailand.ORCID 0000 0003 3019 9877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the relationship between preoperative inflammatory markers and recurrence of CIN after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).

methodsA retrospective historical cohort study was conducted at gynecologic oncology unit, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Royal Thai Air Force, Thailand. Data was collected from medical records of CIN cases from year 2016 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were subjects who were diagnosed of CIN and underwent LEEP with pathologic confirmation and followed up for two years (at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years). Preoperative complete blood count (CBC) was obtained within one month for calculation as systemic inflammatory values.

resultsOne hundred and ten cases of CIN were enrolled. Mean age of participants was 48.1 years old. Three-fourths (83/110) of the participants had histological confirmation as CIN2/3. Sixteen (18/110) and twenty (22/110) percentage of cases had recurrence of disease at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Monocytes /lymphocytes ratio (MLR) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) could predict recurrence of CIN within 2 years. MLR more than 0.16 and SIRI more than 0.57 gave the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) at percentage of 77.3/ 81.8 and 91.8/ 90.2, respectively. Combination of MLR and SIRI had sensitivity and NPV at 90.5 and 95.4 percent, respectively. MLR and SIRI could not predict marginal involvement, glandular involvement, and LEEP confirmed CIN 2/3.

conclusionPretreatment MLR and SIRI were statistically significant in predicting the recurrence in CIN after post LEEP procedure within 2 years follow up.

Indexed as

ElectrosurgeryInflammationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesThailandBiomarkers, TumorKeywords: CINMLRrecurrentSIRI

Identifiers

PMID38809635
PMCPMC11318804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.