ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Convolutional Neural Network-Based Prediction of Axial Length Using Color Fundus Photography.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in cataract management: current status and future perspectives.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Axial Length Estimation Using Metadata From Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Observational
- Quantitative color fundus photography parameters as potential biomarkers of axial length progression: evidence from a machine learning cohort study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Predicting myopia risk using a machine learning model based on fundus imageomics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in optical coherence tomography in myopia and pathological myopia.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Generative artificial intelligence in ophthalmology research writing: A comprehensive review of applications, detection tools, and ethical considerations.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models for predicting the axial length (AL) using color fundus photography (CFP) and explore associated clinical and structural characteristics. Methods: This study enrolled 1105 fundus images from 467 participants with ALs ranging from 19.91 to 32.59 mm, obtained at National Taiwan University Hospital between 2020 and 2021. The AL measurements obtained from a scanning laser interferometer served as the gold standard. The accuracy of prediction was compared among CNN-based models with different inputs, including CFP, age, and/or sex. Heatmaps were interpreted by integrated gradients. Results: Using age, sex, and CFP as input, the mean ± standard deviation absolute error (MAE) for AL prediction by the model was 0.771 ± 0.128 mm, outperforming models that used age and sex alone (1.263 ± 0.115 mm; P < 0.001) and CFP alone (0.831 ± 0.216 mm; P = 0.016) by 39.0% and 7.31%, respectively. The removal of relatively poor-quality CFPs resulted in a slight MAE reduction to 0.759 ± 0.120 mm without statistical significance (P = 0.24). The inclusion of age and CFP improved prediction accuracy by 5.59% (P = 0.043), while adding sex had no significant improvement (P = 0.41). The optic disc and temporal peripapillary area were highlighted as the focused areas on the heatmaps. Conclusions: Deep learning-based prediction of AL using CFP was fairly accurate and enhanced by age inclusion. The optic disc and temporal peripapillary area may contain crucial structural information for AL prediction in CFP. Translational Relevance: This study might aid AL assessments and the understanding of the morphologic characteristics of the fundus related to AL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.