ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2024
Side differences and reproducibility of the Moxy muscle oximeter during cycling in trained men.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic versus fixed pillow height systems and cervical muscle function: a randomized crossover trial.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026Trial
- Effects of inspiratory muscle training on exercise capacity, muscle oxygenation and strength, physical activity, and dyspnea in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome and pulmonary involvement: a randomized controlled triple-blinded study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Trial
- Interindividual differences in dyspnea during acute hypoxic exercise in healthy adults: A single exposure to simulated altitude at ~9000 ft.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Weekend Cyclists vs. Regular Cyclists: Association of Physical Training Distribution on Performance, Cardiometabolic Parameters and Muscle Oxygen Saturation.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Agreement between muscle saturation breakpoints and lactate thresholds: Muscles comparison and sex difference in world-class Nordic skiers.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Reliability and applicability of theEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2025Article
- Physiological Predictors of Peak Velocity in the VAM-EVAL Incremental Test and the Role of Kinematic Variables in Running Economy in Triathletes.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Response to: methodological considerations for assessing SmOEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2025Article
- Acute responses to low-intensity aerobic exercise with continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- The relationship and agreement between systemic and local breakpoints in locomotor and non-locomotor muscles during single-leg cycling.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of leg symmetry in muscle oxygen saturation during submaximal to maximal cycling exercise.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Muscle reoxygenation is slower after higher cycling intensity, and is faster and more reliable in locomotor than in accessory muscle sites.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePortable near-infrared spectroscopy devices allow measurements of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO
methodsTwelve trained cyclists and triathletes completed 3 incremental step tests with 5 min step duration starting at 1.0 W/kg with an increase of 0.5 W/kg separated by 2-7 days. SmO
resultsANOVA showed no significant systematic differences between trials and side. For both legs and all intensities, the ICC ranged from 0.79 to 0.92, the SEM from 5 to 9% SmO
conclusionRelative reliability of SmO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.